---
title: "Philippines Crypto Regulation Monitor | cryptoassets.gi"
canonical: https://cryptoassets.gi/jurisdictions/philippines/
source_html: /jurisdictions/philippines/index.html
description: "Philippines crypto asset regulation: 9 categories, 29 sourced findings, updated 2026-10-25. Licensing, token classification, stablecoins, tax treatment."
generated_at: 2026-11-07T14:19:44Z
content_sha256: 09ee2acbeadd8f8773a33276259bd5b7cdf29b7893f26bd2071d0931062f1b43
generator: "fe-fleet/md-twin@1.0"
---
# Philippines Crypto & Digital Asset Regulation

schema crypto-v2.0.0
trajectory: not yet assessed in transition overlaps: [Sentinel (AML/CFT)](https://sentinel.gi/jurisdictions/philippines/), [World Payments](https://payments.gi/jurisdictions/philippines/)

Last updated 2026-10-25 · 9 categories · 29 sourced
findings · 35 sources in the cumulative register

Download report (PDF) Expand all

Evidence re-verified: 2026-10-25 · Position last changed: 2026-10-25 · Record history & provenance ▾ Methodology & record provenance: Module confidence is derived from the underlying claims (source tier and primary excerpt retention), while statutory legal force is tracked independently.

Review status: AI-synthesised · Tier-1/2 verified · As-of date: 2026-10-26

[Open in Co-Pilot ↗](/reports/?type=copilot&j=PHILIPPINES)[Build Report](/reports/?j=PHILIPPINES)[Compare](/compare/?j=PHILIPPINES)

Framework posture In transition 8 of 9 modules populated · AI-synthesised · Tier-1/2 verified

Lead supervisory authority CoinDesk Primary statutory & supervisory perimeter

Next milestone (> 2026-10-26) 2026-Q4 BSP OPS freeze / VASP-adjacent merchant reclassification finalisation

Module coverage & confidence 8 / 9 modules assessed 0 Confirmed · 8 Probable · 0 Uncertain · 1 Not yet assessed

9 Categories

0 Moved this cycle 0 Key judgments 2 Open gaps 29 Findings

1 Tier-1 sources

Confidence mix 9 unpopulated
(sums to 9 rendered categories; click to filter)

No categories moved this cycle.

## Jurisdiction lead brief

###### Latest update · 25 October 2026

#### Lead Signal

Mynt Inc., the parent company of GCash, completed the Philippines' largest-ever initial public offering on the Philippine Stock Exchange on 20 October 2026, raising up to PHP 60.9 billion (approximately US$965.4 million) at PHP 6.60 per share. The listing is the largest in Philippine history and Southeast Asia's largest since 2021. While Mynt itself is not a licensed virtual-asset service provider, GCash's crypto on-ramp, GCrypto, operates through the licensed VASP PDAX, placing the listing adjacent to the regulated digital-asset perimeter even though the transaction itself sits outside the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas's VASP licensing framework.

#### Other Developments

No change to the core VASP licensing perimeter was located this period; the moratorium on new VASP licence applications, extended effective 1 September 2025, remains the operative constraint on new entrants, with the only reported route being via BSP-supervised financial institutions seeking combined bank-plus-VASP authority. The anonymity-enhancing-asset listing ban imposed by BSP Memorandum M-2026-023 in June 2026 also remains unchanged, continuing to prohibit licensed VASPs from listing, supporting, or offering privacy-focused tokens. Neither standing restriction bears directly on the Mynt listing, but both frame the regulatory environment GCash's crypto-adjacent operations continue to sit within.

#### Cross-Monitor Connections

The Mynt IPO carries payments-market significance tracked in parallel by other monitors, given GCash's position as the Philippines' dominant e-wallet operator and its reported post-IPO exploration of a move into digital banking. The transaction itself was not reported as subject to any contested financial-crime or sanctions review, and no overlap flag arising from an AML, anti-corruption or cross-border payments concern was identified in connection with the listing this period.

#### Outlook

Whether GCash's reported exploration of a digital-banking expansion, funded in part by IPO proceeds, advances to a formal regulatory filing remains unconfirmed and will be a focal point for subsequent monitoring. Separately, the BSP's pending exposure draft on a twelve-month freeze on new Operator-of-Payment-System registrations and reclassification of VASP-adjacent merchants as high-risk, expected around the fourth quarter of 2026, could shape the compliance environment GCash's crypto-adjacent and payments operations continue to sit within, though its finalisation remains unconfirmed as at this period.

3 earlier updates not shown here.

###### Standing brief · as of 3 September 2026

Written before the update above. Where they differ, the update is the more recent position.

#### Lead Signal

The Philippines' bifurcated crypto licensing perimeter tightened further this cycle. Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas has confirmed, via Monetary Board Resolution No. 848 (20 August 2025) and Memorandum No. M-2025-031, that its moratorium on new Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) Certificate of Authority applications -- originally announced in 2022 as a three-year window closing September 2025 -- has instead been continued indefinitely from 1 September 2025, subject to periodic reassessment, with an exception carved out for existing BSP-supervised financial institutions expanding into crypto operations. This confirmation now rests on a T3-tier source reproducing the BSP resolution text, an upgrade from the T4-only secondary reporting that had previously left the moratorium's status ambiguous. The practical effect is a materially longer barrier to new BSP-licensed market entry than had previously been assumed, layered onto a separate, non-substitutable Securities and Exchange Commission authorization requirement for crypto-asset-service platforms that took effect 5 July 2025, covering AML systems, suspicious transaction reporting and customer due diligence. Neither the SEC crypto-asset-service framework nor the underlying BSP VASP licensing circular has yet been confirmed against a primary sec.gov.ph or bsp.gov.ph issuance, so both pillars of the dual-regulator perimeter continue to rest on secondary reporting even as their substantive requirements tighten.

#### Other Developments

The SEC's enforcement posture around unauthorized offshore platforms remains active: an August 2025 notice and consumer advisory named OKX, Bybit, Bitget, MEXC, KuCoin and Kraken as accessible to Philippine residents without the required registration. Binance's own re-entry saga illustrates the perimeter's practical bite and its limits -- blocked from local access since March 2024, Binance was, as of June 2026, still reported to lack both SEC and BSP VASP authorization despite attempting re-entry through local partner BlockShoals, though later reporting from July 2026 indicates access resumed under an SEC sandbox arrangement whose BSP VASP status remains unresolved. A widely reported 90-day requirement for BlockShoals to integrate with a licensed domestic VASP before onboarding users through Binance's offshore infrastructure has been reclassified this cycle: it is a case-specific SEC StratBox sandbox condition tied to that particular arrangement, not a general BSP or SEC cross-border access rule applicable to offshore exchanges generally. On token classification, the general implementing rules for the Financial Products and Services Consumer Protection Act (SEC Memorandum Circular No. 05, Series of 2023) were finalized and took effect 8 May 2023; only a narrower proposal to classify 'tokenized securities products' as securities under distributed ledger technology remains in draft. The Philippines still has no confirmed comprehensive statutory taxonomy distinguishing utility tokens, stablecoins, NFTs and asset-referenced tokens, with classification proceeding case by case, as it did with Axie Infinity's SLP tokens. In stablecoins, BSP's 2024 sandbox approval for Coins.ph to pilot a peso-referenced stablecoin (PHPC), backed by cash and cash-equivalents in Philippine bank accounts, remains the only authorization on record; there is still no general statute-based reserve, redemption-right, disclosure or systemic-designation regime for stablecoins generally. Tax treatment of crypto activity continues to rest on general Tax Code property-disposition principles and a 2021 Department of Finance position that play-to-earn income (again, Axie Infinity) is taxable Philippine-source income, rather than any dedicated BIR circular addressing capital gains, VAT or withholding on crypto transactions specifically. No Philippine-specific primary-source rule has been identified for DeFi lending, staking, mining, node operation or validator activity, a gap treated as a research absence rather than a confirmed exemption.

#### Cross-Monitor Connections

Two cross-monitor threads carry forward from this cycle. AML/CFT obligations bundled into both the SEC crypto-asset-service authorization and BSP VASP supervision are owned as subscribed-surface content by the financial-integrity monitor rather than duplicated here, and the AML-adjacent dimensions of the SEC StratBox sandbox gating mechanism for the BlockShoals/Binance arrangement extend that same overlap into cross-border transfer tracking. Separately, BSP's approval of the Coins.ph peso-referenced stablecoin pilot carries a remittance-market framing relevant to world-payments tracking, and the 2021 Department of Finance position on play-to-earn income taxation is likewise flagged as relevant to world-payments' tax-treatment coverage of blockchain-game-linked income streams.

#### Outlook

Three items anchor forward monitoring. First, BSP's periodic reassessment of the now-indefinite VASP moratorium under Resolution No. 848 will determine whether the current entry barrier eases, holds, or hardens further. Second, whether the SEC's draft proposal to classify tokenized securities products under the FPSCPA framework is finalized -- and under what citation -- will resolve a currently open classification gap distinct from the already-finalized general implementing rules. Third, the outcome of BSP VASP licensing for the BlockShoals-partnered Binance re-entry arrangement, following its SEC sandbox condition, will indicate whether case-specific sandbox pathways are becoming a durable route to market access for offshore exchanges, or remain narrowly bounded exceptions. Across all three, the underlying evidentiary picture remains constrained by the absence of primary-source SEC and BSP issuance text, which keeps escalation to primary-source confirmation the standing priority for this jurisdiction.

Read full brief · 1177 words

Key regulatory facts for Philippines Regulatory Dimension Philippines Standing Position

Jurisdiction Philippines (PH)

Regulatory Scope Crypto & Digital Asset Regulation (9 modules, 29 sourced findings)

Crypto Licensing Two parallel licensing regimes apply: BSP licenses VASPs under Circular No.

Token Classification The Philippines has no comprehensive statutory taxonomy for crypto-assets distinguishing security tokens, utility tokens, stablecoins, or NFTs.

On-Chain Activity Regime No Philippine primary-source regulation specifically addressing staking, DeFi lending, DEX operation, mining, node operation, validator activity, or tokenization as discrete on-chain activities was located.

Stablecoin Regime Coins.ph's PHPC, a 1:1 peso-pegged fiat-collateralised stablecoin, has exited the BSP Regulatory Sandbox Framework after meeting sandbox KPIs, unlocking expanded minting capacity; no bespoke standalone stablecoin...

Primary Instruments Cited CoinDesk, CoinDesk, CoinDesk, Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP), Securities and Exchange Commission (Philippines)

Last Confirmed / Updated 2026-10-25 (35 sources in cumulative register)

9 of 9 categories

Signal
Moved
Judgment
Gap

Density
Comfortable
Compact

Expand all sources
Reset all

Selections OR within a group, AND across groups. Press / to search.

### Philippines: C1 Crypto LicensingAmberEnacted in forceModule confidence: Probable▾

Two parallel licensing regimes apply: BSP licenses VASPs under Circular No. 1108 (2021); SEC separately licenses CASPs under Memorandum Circulars No. 4 and No. 5, Series of 2025. BSP's VASP licensing moratorium, in place since September 2022, was extended indefinitely from 1 September 2025. Binance is attempting re-entry via SEC's StratBox sandbox through local partner BlockShoals, but BSP has confirmed sandbox approval does not substitute for the separate BSP VASP licence, which BlockShoals/Binance still lack.

Open gap — crypto-int-1 BSP Circular 1108's capital-adequacy, large-payout and Travel Rule threshold figures rest on T3 secondary trackers; no BSP primary text was retrieved this cycle to independently confirm. no under-indexing note recorded

Horizon · 2026-Q4 (± six months) BSP OPS freeze / VASP-adjacent merchant reclassification finalisation Consultation · Tier 3 source

#### Crypto Licensing

The Philippines operates a dual-regulator crypto licensing perimeter with two non-substitutable authorization tracks. The Securities and Exchange Commission requires authorization for crypto asset service platforms before they may offer crypto asset services in the Philippines, a framework that took effect 5 July 2025 and covers AML systems, suspicious transaction reporting, and customer due diligence obligations. Separately, Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas requires its own Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) license to facilitate crypto payment and transaction rails -- a license that is distinct from, and not satisfied by, SEC registration or participation in a regulatory sandbox. Both authorization requirements are currently sourced only to secondary reporting (T4-tier), with the exact SEC Memorandum Circular numbers and the underlying BSP VASP licensing circular not yet confirmed against a primary sec.gov.ph or bsp.gov.ph issuance; confidence on both core licensing claims has accordingly been held at Probable rather than Confirmed pending that primary-source escalation.

The most consequential development this cycle concerns the BSP side of that perimeter. BSP halted processing of new VASP license applications starting 1 September 2022, a freeze originally framed as a three-year window. Per Monetary Board Resolution No. 848 (20 August 2025) and Memorandum No. M-2025-031, that moratorium has now been continued indefinitely from 1 September 2025, subject to periodic reassessment, citing consumer protection and cybercrime concerns, with an exception preserved for existing BSP-supervised financial institutions expanding into crypto operations. This confirmation carries materially better sourcing than the original three-year-window claim: it rests on a T3-tier source reproducing the resolution and memorandum text, whereas the initial characterization of the freeze traced only to T4 secondary reporting from 2022. The two claims describing this moratorium -- one anchored to the original 2022 announcement and effective date, the other inserted this cycle with the confirmed indefinite-continuation language and T3 sourcing -- are retained separately in this record as they carry distinct claim identifiers from different fold cycles; composition flags this as a claim-identity duplication concern warranting review rather than silently collapsing the two.

On the enforcement side, the SEC's active posture against unauthorized offshore platforms continues. An August 2025 notice identified OKX, Bybit, Bitget, MEXC, KuCoin and Kraken as accessible to Philippine residents without the required registration -- a direct enforcement signal that the licensing perimeter is being policed against major international platforms, not merely a paper requirement. Binance's own trajectory since being blocked from local access in March 2024 illustrates both the perimeter's bite and its permeability: as of June 2026 reporting, the exchange still lacked both SEC and BSP VASP authorization despite an attempted re-entry via local partner BlockShoals, though subsequent July 2026 reporting indicates Binance resumed access through a BlockShoals-partnered arrangement operating under SEC sandbox supervision -- with full BSP VASP licensing for that specific arrangement still unresolved. This sequence underscores that sandbox-mediated access and full dual-regulator licensing remain distinct statuses that market entrants and monitors alike should not conflate.

Taken together, the licensing picture for the Philippines this cycle is one of active tightening rather than stabilization: an indefinite BSP moratorium replacing what had been assumed to be a lapsing three-year freeze, continued SEC enforcement naming specific unregistered platforms, and a prominent test case (Binance/BlockShoals) demonstrating that sandbox participation does not equate to full licensing. The overall traffic-light assessment remains amber -- a binding, actively enforced dual-authorization requirement exists, but the exact primary-source citations for both the SEC and BSP frameworks remain outstanding, and the moratorium's practical duration is now open-ended rather than fixed.

#### Outlook

The most immediate forward marker is BSP's own periodic reassessment cadence for the continued moratorium under Resolution No. 848, which will determine whether the indefinite freeze on new VASP applications eases or hardens. Separately, the BSP VASP licensing outcome for the BlockShoals-partnered Binance sandbox arrangement will be a live test of whether sandbox pathways can convert into full dual-regulator authorization for offshore exchanges, or whether that route remains structurally incomplete. Primary-source confirmation of the SEC's 5 July 2025 crypto-asset-service circular and the BSP VASP licensing circular remains the standing evidentiary priority; until retrieved, the licensing module's core claims will continue to carry Probable rather than Confirmed confidence regardless of how the underlying regime evolves.

Read full sub-brief · 692 words Periodic update · new data 2026-10-18

#### Crypto Licensing

The Philippines operates a dual-regulator crypto-licensing architecture. The Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas, under Circular No. 1108 (2021), requires virtual asset service providers offering services or engaging in VASP activities in the Philippines to register for, or obtain, BSP authorisation, with minimum capital requirements of PHP 50 million for custodial VASPs and PHP 10 million for non-custodial VASPs. Separately, the Securities and Exchange Commission, under Memorandum Circulars No. 4 and No. 5, Series of 2025, in force since 5 July 2025, requires crypto-asset service providers, including foreign platforms serving Filipino users, to register as a domestic stock corporation with minimum paid-up capital of PHP 100 million.

The defining constraint on this otherwise in-force framework is the BSP's moratorium on new VASP licence applications. First imposed in September 2022, the moratorium was extended indefinitely from 1 September 2025, with limited exceptions for BSP-supervised financial institutions, and no fixed end date has been stated. The exact BSP memorandum number formally extending the moratorium indefinitely was not independently retrieved this cycle, though the moratorium's continuation and its September 2025 extension are corroborated.

This moratorium's practical effect is illustrated by the stalled re-entry of Binance into the Philippine market via a local partner, BlockShoals Technologies. BSP has stated that SEC StratBox sandbox approval, which BlockShoals obtained, does not substitute for the separate BSP VASP authorisation required to offer crypto-related payment or transaction services, and that BlockShoals/Binance currently lack that BSP licence. No BSP primary-document statement confirming this position was independently retrieved this cycle; the finding is sourced from press reporting of BSP's stance.

#### Outlook

The indefinite duration of the BSP moratorium remains the central licensing-architecture question for the Philippine crypto market: until BSP articulates criteria or a timeline for lifting it, new entrants seeking a full BSP VASP licence have no clear pathway, regardless of sandbox or SEC-level approvals obtained elsewhere. The resolution of the Binance/BlockShoals matter will be a significant marker of how rigidly BSP intends to enforce the moratorium against commercially significant re-entry attempts.

1 earlier distinct update(s) Periodic update · new data 2026-10-04

#### Crypto Licensing

The Philippines regulates virtual asset service providers under Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas Circular No. 1108, Series of 2021, which remains the primary in-force framework. Under this regime, VASPs providing custody or safekeeping services must hold a minimum of PHP 50.0 million in paid-in capital, while non-custodial VASPs face a lower minimum of PHP 10.0 million; pinpoint article or section citation for these figures was not independently retrieved this cycle, though secondary sources converge on the stated amounts. Since 1 September 2022, BSP has maintained a moratorium on new standalone VASP Certificate-of-Authority applications, and that moratorium remains in effect with no published lifting date located. The principal pathway presently available to new entrants is authorization as a bank or quasi-bank VASP, which sits outside the standalone-applicant moratorium.

A BSP memorandum numbered M-2026-003, dated 30 January 2026, reminds BSP-supervised institutions that they may deal only with authorized or licensed VASPs, or with SEC-authorized crypto-asset service providers, and states that Philippine-resident retail access to unlicensed offshore VASPs is not allowed. This reaffirms, rather than changes, the existing authorized-dealing principle, but the timing of the reminder suggests continued regulatory attention to channelling activity through licensed entities during the period the standalone moratorium remains in force.

#### Outlook

The moratorium's duration without a published end date is the central open item: a lifting announcement, or a published extension with a stated new term, would be the next material development. Primary BSP circular or memorandum text, if retrieved directly in a future cycle, would also allow the capital-requirement figures and the memorandum's precise authorized-dealing language to move from secondary-sourced to primary-confirmed.

1 further periodic run re-emitted the standing brief unchanged and is not shown.

Sources and findings (10)
- T3[CoinDesk](https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2025/08/06/philippines-sec-cracks-down-on-unregistered-crypto-exchanges-as-new-rules-kick-in) — SEC regulations effective 5 July 2025 require crypto asset service platforms to obtain authorization before offering crypto asset services in the Philippines, including AML systems, suspicious transaction reporting, and customer due diligence.
- T3[CoinDesk](https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2026/06/11/philippines-central-bank-says-binance-and-its-local-partner-lack-licenses-to-operate) — Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas separately requires a VASP license to facilitate crypto payment and transaction rails in the Philippines, which is distinct from, and not satisfied by, SEC registration or sandbox participation.
- T3[CoinDesk](https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2025/08/06/philippines-sec-cracks-down-on-unregistered-crypto-exchanges-as-new-rules-kick-in) — In an August 2025 notice, the SEC identified OKX, Bybit, Bitget, MEXC, KuCoin and Kraken as accessible to Philippine residents without the required registration, warning the public against using these platforms.
- T3[CoinDesk](https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2026/06/11/philippines-central-bank-says-binance-and-its-local-partner-lack-licenses-to-operate) — Binance has been blocked from local access by the Philippines SEC since March 2024 for operating without the necessary license, and as of mid-2026 still lacks both SEC and BSP VASP authorization despite attempting re-entry via a local partner.
- T4[Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP)](https://crypto.news/binance-philippines-return-hits-wall-as-bsp-flags-license-gap/) — BSP has stated that SEC StratBox sandbox approval (granted to BlockShoals Technologies) does not substitute for the separate BSP VASP authorisation required to offer crypto-related payment/transaction services; BlockShoals/Binance currently lack that BSP licence.
- T3[Securities and Exchange Commission (Philippines)](https://www.aureadalaw.com/post/sec-tightens-rules-on-crypto-asset-service-providers-in-the-philippines) — SEC Memorandum Circulars No. 4 and No. 5, Series of 2025 require CASPs, including foreign platforms serving Filipino users, to register as a domestic stock corporation with minimum paid-up capital of PHP 100 million, maintain segregation of client and company funds, and comply with marketing/disclosure rules, in force since 5 July 2025.
- T3Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas — Per Monetary Board Resolution No. 848 (20 August 2025) and Memorandum No. M-2025-031, BSP continued the moratorium on new VASP Certificate of Authority applications indefinitely from 1 September 2025, subject to periodic reassessment.
- T2[Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas](https://fintechnews.ph/61554/crypto/here-are-the-licensed-cryptocurrency-exchanges-in-the-philippines/) — registration before offering custody/conversion/transfer services
- T3[Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas](https://liveinph.com/crypto-p2p-philippines-binance-pdax-2026) — moratorium on new VASP licence applications, extended effective 1 September 2025

### Philippines: C2 Token ClassificationAmberEnacted in forceModule confidence: Probable▾

The Philippines has no comprehensive statutory taxonomy for crypto-assets distinguishing security tokens, utility tokens, stablecoins, or NFTs. The SEC's 2023 draft rules under the Financial Products and Services Consumer Protection Act (FPSCPA) propose bringing 'tokenized securities products' within the existing securities definition, but a finalized, comprehensive classification framework has not been confirmed via primary source at this run.

Periodic update · new data 2026-10-18

#### Token Classification

BSP Memorandum M-2026-023, approved 5 June 2026, prohibits licensed virtual asset service providers from listing or supporting privacy and anonymity-enhancing tokens, effective from its approval date. This is an AML-adjacent classification measure rather than a comprehensive token-taxonomy reform: it does not establish a broader framework for classifying tokens by type (utility, security, payment, or otherwise), but instead carves out a specific category of anonymity-enhancing tokens as impermissible for licensed VASPs to support.

No broader statutory token-classification reform was identified for the Philippines this cycle. The measure should be read within the context of BSP's stated strict posture on crypto anonymity and traceability concerns, which the central bank's leadership has separately reiterated in public remarks this cycle regarding the sector generally.

#### Outlook

Whether BSP extends token-classification restrictions beyond privacy and anonymity-enhancing tokens to other categories remains to be seen. The anonymity-token prohibition should be monitored for enforcement activity, such as any VASP found to be non-compliant, which would be the first practical test of how strictly BSP intends to apply Memorandum M-2026-023.

C2 · Token Classification — Full Module Record 0 sub-modules · 180 words · 3 traced claims · Re-verified 2026-10-25

The decision headline, regulatory posture (Amber), primary framework, and supervisory authority above are open on the Free Explore layer. Register free with a business email for 3 full-record passes a month , or unlock all 170 jurisdictions with Pro (£39/mo · £99/mo all products) or Firm (£199/mo · £449/mo all products) .

[Unlock with Free Pass / Sign In](https://a-i.gi/auth/login) [View Pro & Firm Plans (£39 / £199)](https://a-i.gi/licensing/#plans)[View Open Exemplar (Gibraltar)](/jurisdictions/gi/)

### Philippines: C3 On-Chain Activity RegimeRedEnacted in forceModule confidence: Probable▾

No Philippine primary-source regulation specifically addressing staking, DeFi lending, DEX operation, mining, node operation, validator activity, or tokenization as discrete on-chain activities was located. Such activity, if conducted commercially, would likely fall under the general SEC crypto-asset-service or BSP VASP licensing perimeter, but no activity-specific rules are confirmed.

C3 · On-Chain Activity — Full Module Record 0 sub-modules · 180 words · 1 traced claims · Re-verified 2026-10-25

The decision headline, regulatory posture (Red), primary framework, and supervisory authority above are open on the Free Explore layer. Register free with a business email for 3 full-record passes a month , or unlock all 170 jurisdictions with Pro (£39/mo · £99/mo all products) or Firm (£199/mo · £449/mo all products) .

[Unlock with Free Pass / Sign In](https://a-i.gi/auth/login)[View Pro & Firm Plans (£39 / £199)](https://a-i.gi/licensing/#plans)[View Open Exemplar (Gibraltar)](/jurisdictions/gi/)

### Philippines: C4 Stablecoin RegimeAmberEnacted in forceModule confidence: Probable▾

Coins.ph's PHPC, a 1:1 peso-pegged fiat-collateralised stablecoin, has exited the BSP Regulatory Sandbox Framework after meeting sandbox KPIs, unlocking expanded minting capacity; no bespoke standalone stablecoin statute exists, and issuance continues under existing VASP/EMI licensing.

Periodic update · new data 2026-10-04

#### Stablecoin Regime

The Philippines has no dedicated stablecoin-specific statute; stablecoin activity is instead governed through existing VASP and electronic money issuer licensing categories layered with BSP's Regulatory Sandbox Framework for graduating pilot products into production. Coins.ph's PHPC, a fiat-collateralised stablecoin pegged 1:1 to the Philippine peso, exited the BSP Regulatory Sandbox Framework in August 2026 after meeting the sandbox's key performance indicators, according to the issuer's own reporting. The exit is reported to unlock expanded minting capacity for PHPC under Coins.ph's existing VASP and electronic money issuer licences, rather than conferring any separate stablecoin-specific authorization; no independent BSP confirmation of the sandbox exit or its practical effect has been retrieved this cycle.

Because the stablecoin framework runs through general VASP and EMI licensing rather than a bespoke regime, the prudential baseline applicable to a stablecoin issuer such as Coins.ph is the same minimum paid-in capital structure that applies to VASPs generally: PHP 50.0 million for providers offering custody or safekeeping services, and PHP 10.0 million for non-custodial providers. PHPC's status as a sandbox graduate rather than a holder of a dedicated stablecoin licence is itself a notable feature of the current regime, reflecting that the Philippines has so far addressed stablecoins through adaptation of existing instruments rather than new legislation.

#### Outlook

The principal item to watch is whether BSP issues any direct statement or confirmation regarding PHPC's post-sandbox status, since the only source presently available is issuer-reported. A future BSP circular establishing a dedicated stablecoin licensing category, should one emerge, would represent a structural change from the current sandbox-to-production approach.

C4 · Stablecoins & EMTs — Full Module Record 0 sub-modules · 180 words · 2 traced claims · Re-verified 2026-10-25

The decision headline, regulatory posture (Amber), primary framework, and supervisory authority above are open on the Free Explore layer. Register free with a business email for 3 full-record passes a month , or unlock all 170 jurisdictions with Pro (£39/mo · £99/mo all products) or Firm (£199/mo · £449/mo all products) .

[Unlock with Free Pass / Sign In](https://a-i.gi/auth/login)[View Pro & Firm Plans (£39 / £199)](https://a-i.gi/licensing/#plans)[View Open Exemplar (Gibraltar)](/jurisdictions/gi/)

### Philippines: C5 Consumer ProtectionAmberEnacted in forceModule confidence: Probable▾

Consumer protection for crypto activity is being built on two tracks: (i) SEC public warnings/advisories against unauthorized platforms, and (ii) the broader Financial Products and Services Consumer Protection Act (FPSCPA) implementing rules, which the SEC's 2023 draft proposed extending to crypto/tokenized securities via disclosure, fair market conduct, and dispute-resolution obligations.

#### Consumer Protection

Philippine consumer protection coverage of crypto activity operates on two tracks that this cycle's research has clarified were previously conflated. The general implementing rules for the Financial Products and Services Consumer Protection Act (SEC Memorandum Circular No. 05, Series of 2023) were finalized and took effect 8 May 2023, establishing fair market conduct, transparency, and dispute-handling mechanisms applicable within the broader consumer financial protection framework. Earlier characterizations describing this general framework itself as still in draft form have been corrected this cycle: what remains in draft is a narrower, tokenized-securities-specific extension of the classification and consumer-protection treatment first proposed in a 2023 SEC comment-seeking notice, not the general implementing rules themselves.

On the active-enforcement side, the SEC issued a public advisory on 4 August 2025 warning consumers against using unregistered crypto exchange platforms marketing to Philippine residents -- a direct, dated consumer-facing warning tied to the same enforcement action that named OKX, Bybit, Bitget, MEXC, KuCoin and Kraken as operating without required registration. This advisory is non-binding by nature and functions as a risk-disclosure mechanism rather than a licensing or enforcement instrument in its own right; its regulatory-stage designation has accordingly been cleared in this composed record, since advisory notices of this kind do not proceed through the proposed/enacted/in-force lifecycle that applies to binding rules.

The module's amber traffic-light assessment and Uncertain confidence reflect a framework that combines a genuinely finalized general consumer-protection structure with an actively used advisory/warning mechanism, but no confirmed extension of formal dispute-handling or market-conduct mechanisms specifically tailored to tokenized securities or crypto-asset products beyond the general FPSCPA baseline.

#### Outlook

Finalization status of the narrower tokenized-securities classification and consumer-protection proposal remains the key open item, tracked jointly with the token_classification module. Continued SEC advisory activity naming specific unregistered platforms should be expected as an ongoing enforcement-adjacent signal independent of that classification question.

Read full sub-brief · 308 words Periodic update · new data 2026-10-18

#### Consumer Protection

The Securities and Exchange Commission's crypto-asset service provider guidelines, under Memorandum Circulars No. 4 and No. 5, Series of 2025, in force since 5 July 2025, establish two core consumer-protection requirements. First, CASPs must segregate customer crypto-asset funds from the CASP's own corporate funds, a custody-segregation rule intended to protect client assets in the event of a CASP's insolvency or operational failure. Second, third-party crypto marketing agents, social-media affiliates and content creators who receive consideration for promoting CASPs or their products must be registered and disclosed, with solidary liability established between CASPs and their promoters for marketing-related harms.

The solidary-liability structure is a notable consumer-protection design choice: it makes the underlying CASP jointly liable alongside its marketing agents and affiliates, reducing the ability of a CASP to disclaim responsibility for harmful or misleading promotional content by attributing it solely to an independent promoter. The current operational status of the SEC's planned Crypto-Asset Investor Compensation Fund, reportedly targeted for Q1 2026, was not confirmed this cycle, leaving open whether a dedicated compensation mechanism beyond custody segregation is yet operative.

#### Outlook

Confirmation of the Crypto-Asset Investor Compensation Fund's operational status would be a significant addition to the Philippine consumer-protection picture, moving beyond custody segregation and marketing-disclosure rules toward a dedicated investor-compensation mechanism. Enforcement activity testing the solidary-liability provision against CASPs and their marketing affiliates would also be a useful signal of how actively this consumer-protection framework is being applied in practice.

1 earlier distinct update(s) Periodic update · new data 2026-10-11

#### Consumer Protection

The Securities and Exchange Commission issued an investor advisory in April 2026 naming seven platforms — dYdX, Aevo, gTrade, Pacifica, Orderly, Deriv and Ostium — as unauthorised to solicit investment from the Philippine public. The advisory carries statutory weight: violations under the underlying framework attract penalties of up to PHP5,000,000 and/or imprisonment of up to 21 years. This is an active enforcement signal from the SEC, operating under the general consumer-protection and securities framework comprising Republic Act No. 11765 (2022), the Securities Regulation Code (Republic Act No. 8799), and Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas Circular No. 1108 for VASP-specific conduct.

What the current regime does not yet provide is a crypto-specific custody-segregation or market-abuse statute of the kind found in more developed frameworks, such as Article 75 of the EU's Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation. Consumer protection for Philippine crypto-asset holders therefore rests on the combination of general securities law, the general consumer-protection act, and BSP's VASP conduct rules, applied through case-by-case advisory and enforcement action against specific unauthorised platforms, rather than through a dedicated custody or market-conduct statute tailored to virtual assets.

The practical effect for market participants is that the SEC's naming-and-shaming advisory mechanism, backed by real statutory penalties, is the operative deterrent against unregistered solicitation in this jurisdiction, while licensed VASPs continue to operate under BSP's existing Circular No. 1108 framework without a parallel crypto-specific consumer-protection layer beyond what the general statutes provide.

#### Outlook

The next marker to watch is whether the SEC moves from advisory warnings to formal enforcement action — fines or prosecution — against any of the seven named platforms, which would test the practical reach of the stated statutory penalties. Separately, any move toward a dedicated custody-segregation or market-abuse statute specific to virtual assets would represent a structural strengthening of this currently general-law-dependent consumer-protection regime.

1 further periodic run re-emitted the standing brief unchanged and is not shown.

Sources and findings (4)
- T3[CoinDesk](https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2025/08/06/philippines-sec-cracks-down-on-unregistered-crypto-exchanges-as-new-rules-kick-in) — The SEC issued a public advisory (dated 4 Aug 2025) warning consumers against using unregistered crypto exchange platforms actively marketing to Philippine residents.
- T3[CoinDesk](https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2023/01/30/philippines-securities-regulator-seeks-comment-on-draft-crypto-rules) — The SEC's 2023 draft FPSCPA implementing rules proposed applying fair market conduct, transparency, and dispute-handling mechanisms aligned with global best practice to financial products and services, with crypto/tokenized securities included in scope.
- T4[Securities and Exchange Commission (Philippines)](https://coingeek.com/philippines-sec-lays-down-rules-for-crypto-service-providers/) — SEC CASP guidelines require segregation of customer crypto-asset funds from a CASP's own corporate funds.
- T4[Securities and Exchange Commission (Philippines)](https://bitpinas.com/learn-how-to-guides/philippine-crypto-regulation-tracker) — Third-party crypto marketing agents, social-media affiliates and content creators receiving consideration must be registered and disclosed, with solidary liability established between CASPs and their promoters.

### Philippines: C6 Tax TreatmentRedEnacted in forceModule confidence: Probable▾

No dedicated Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) issuance specifically classifying the income-tax, capital-gains, VAT, or withholding treatment of crypto-assets has been confirmed via primary source. The Department of Finance has previously taken the position that income from blockchain-based games/tokens (e.g., Axie Infinity SLP) constitutes taxable Philippine-source income, but this is a policy statement rather than a confirmed binding BIR circular directly addressing crypto more broadly.

C6 · Tax Treatment — Full Module Record 0 sub-modules · 180 words · 2 traced claims · Re-verified 2026-10-25

The decision headline, regulatory posture (Red), primary framework, and supervisory authority above are open on the Free Explore layer. Register free with a business email for 3 full-record passes a month , or unlock all 170 jurisdictions with Pro (£39/mo · £99/mo all products) or Firm (£199/mo · £449/mo all products) .

[Unlock with Free Pass / Sign In](https://a-i.gi/auth/login)[View Pro & Firm Plans (£39 / £199)](https://a-i.gi/licensing/#plans)[View Open Exemplar (Gibraltar)](/jurisdictions/gi/)

### Philippines: C7 Cross-Border TransferAmberEnacted in forceModule confidence: Probable▾

No PH-specific outbound-restriction statute or crypto-specific cross-border reporting threshold was located. However, BSP's June 2026 position on Binance/BlockShoals establishes a de facto cross-border gating mechanism: an offshore exchange's local partner must integrate with a BSP-licensed domestic VASP before onboarding users through offshore infrastructure, and SEC sandbox participation does not substitute for this requirement.

Periodic update · new data 2026-10-18

#### Cross-Border Transfer

BSP Memorandum M-2026-003 states that direct retail access in the Philippines to offshore virtual asset service providers is not allowed unless the provider is registered with the BSP or SEC. Under this instrument, BSP-supervised institutions may deal only with authorised or licensed VASPs, SEC-authorised CASPs, or appropriately licensed foreign counterparties; direct retail access to unregistered offshore VASPs is not permitted. The exact issuance date of M-2026-003 was not confirmed from a primary document this cycle.

This cross-border restriction underpins the continued blocking of unlicensed offshore exchanges from serving Philippine retail users directly, and is the same regulatory logic underlying the Binance/BlockShoals re-entry constraint tracked under crypto licensing: a prospective offshore platform must obtain BSP or SEC registration before it may lawfully serve Philippine retail customers, and sandbox-level approval from one regulator does not substitute for the required registration from the other.

#### Outlook

The practical edges of this cross-border restriction remain contested, as illustrated by the Binance/BlockShoals case, where a sandboxed approval has not yet translated into lawful offshore market access. Clarification of M-2026-003's precise issuance date and any enforcement actions taken against unregistered offshore VASPs attempting to serve Philippine retail users would sharpen the current picture.

C7 · Cross-Border & Travel Rule — Full Module Record 0 sub-modules · 180 words · 3 traced claims · Re-verified 2026-10-25

The decision headline, regulatory posture (Amber), primary framework, and supervisory authority above are open on the Free Explore layer. Register free with a business email for 3 full-record passes a month , or unlock all 170 jurisdictions with Pro (£39/mo · £99/mo all products) or Firm (£199/mo · £449/mo all products) .

[Unlock with Free Pass / Sign In](https://a-i.gi/auth/login)[View Pro & Firm Plans (£39 / £199)](https://a-i.gi/licensing/#plans)[View Open Exemplar (Gibraltar)](/jurisdictions/gi/)

### Philippines: C8 AML/CFT RegimeGreenEnacted in forceModule confidence: Probable▾

AML/CFT obligations for crypto are covered under the FIM aml_ctf module subscription and are NOT re-produced as claims here per module-subscription rules. Disambiguation context only: the SEC's July 2025 crypto-asset-service rules bundle AML systems, suspicious transaction reporting, and customer due diligence into the licensing authorization requirement (see crypto_licensing module), and BSP VASP supervision similarly incorporates AML/CFT expectations consistent with FATF Recommendation 15.

C8 · AML/CFT Regime — Full Module Record 0 sub-modules · 180 words · 1 traced claims · Re-verified 2026-10-25

The decision headline, regulatory posture (Green), primary framework, and supervisory authority above are open on the Free Explore layer. Register free with a business email for 3 full-record passes a month , or unlock all 170 jurisdictions with Pro (£39/mo · £99/mo all products) or Firm (£199/mo · £449/mo all products) .

[Unlock with Free Pass / Sign In](https://a-i.gi/auth/login)[View Pro & Firm Plans (£39 / £199)](https://a-i.gi/licensing/#plans)[View Open Exemplar (Gibraltar)](/jurisdictions/gi/)

### Philippines: C9 Commercial Activity unpopulated ▾

## Commercial Activity

Three distinct commercial developments mark this cycle for the Philippine crypto and adjacent payments sector. Mynt Inc., parent of the dominant e-wallet GCash, priced its Philippine Stock Exchange initial public offering, a record-setting fintech listing that, while not itself a crypto-specific event, raises the disclosure and governance profile of the payments infrastructure that increasingly intersects with crypto-asset activity in the Philippines.

Within the narrower crypto space, Coins.ph, operated by Betur Inc., connected USDT and USDC to the QR Ph interoperable payments network starting in April 2026, with Bitcoin and Ether added in June 2026. This connection reached close to 700,000 merchants able to accept these assets through the QR Ph rails, a substantial expansion of practical crypto-asset acceptance infrastructure embedded inside an existing, BSP-promoted national payments scheme.

Separately, BlockShoals Technologies was cleared by the SEC on 2 July 2026 to act as a crypto-asset intermediary inside the SEC's Strategic Sandbox. This clearance is conditional: BlockShoals is required to complete a 90-day systems-integration process with a licensed local virtual-asset service provider before operating at full scale. The sandbox clearance mechanism itself reflects the SEC's approach to supervised experimentation for new crypto-asset intermediary models, distinct from the standing BSP VASP licensing track, which has remained under a moratorium on new entrants since 1 September 2025.

Taken together, these three events indicate continuing commercial momentum in the Philippine crypto-adjacent sector even as the core regulatory licensing tracks (the BSP VASP moratorium and the SEC's capital-floor review for crypto-asset service providers) remain static. — Outlook: The BlockShoals 90-day integration period, running from 2 July 2026, is the nearest-term concrete milestone; its outcome will indicate whether the SEC's Strategic Sandbox produces operational crypto-asset intermediaries under supervised conditions. The continued expansion of Coins.ph's stablecoin and crypto-asset acceptance through QR Ph is also worth monitoring as a proxy for retail crypto-payment adoption growth absent a change to the core licensing moratorium.

Open gap — crypto-int-2 Whether GCash's reported digital-banking exploration has reached a formal regulatory filing stage is not established. Stablecoin regime is structurally thin for PH and should be prioritised given high remittance/e-wallet usage.

Periodic update · new data 2026-10-25

#### Commercial Activity

Mynt Inc., the parent company of GCash, completed an initial public offering on the Philippine Stock Exchange on 20 October 2026, raising up to PHP 60.9 billion (approximately US$965.4 million) at a price of PHP 6.60 per share. The offering is the largest in Philippine stock-market history. Mynt itself is not a licensed virtual-asset service provider, and the listing was not reported as touching the VASP licensing framework administered by the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas. Its relevance to the digital-asset regulatory landscape arises indirectly: GCash, the e-wallet platform under Mynt, operates a crypto on-ramp branded GCrypto through its relationship with PDAX, a BSP-licensed virtual-asset service provider. The listing therefore sits adjacent to, rather than within, the regulated crypto perimeter, strengthening the balance sheet of an entity whose core consumer product has a crypto-adjacent feature without itself altering that feature's regulatory treatment.

No regulatory review of the listing itself, by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Philippine Stock Exchange, or any other authority, was reported as contested or ongoing. The listing proceeded as a conventional capital-markets transaction. Separately, trade press reported that GCash is exploring a move into digital banking following the IPO proceeds, though the stage of any such initiative, whether a formal application has been lodged with the BSP or any other regulator, was not established this period; this remains an open question for future monitoring rather than a confirmed development.

#### Outlook

The principal matter to watch is whether GCash's reported digital-banking exploration advances to a formal regulatory filing, which would bring a BSP licensing process into view for an entity whose existing e-wallet business already carries a licensed crypto on-ramp. Separately, the BSP's pending exposure draft proposing a twelve-month freeze on new Operator-of-Payment-System registrations and a reclassification of VASP-adjacent merchants as high-risk remains unfinalised, with resolution anticipated around the fourth quarter of 2026. Should that draft be adopted, it could affect the payment-relationship structures used by crypto-adjacent merchants operating alongside licensed VASPs, though its final form and effective date remain unconfirmed as at this period.

Sources and findings (3)
- T3[Coins.ph (Betur Inc.)](https://www.datawallet.com/crypto/best-crypto-exchanges-philippines) — USDT and USDC connected to the QR Ph network in April 2026; Bitcoin and Ether added June 2026; reaching close to 700,000 merchants
- T3[BlockShoals Technologies](https://www.datawallet.com/crypto/best-crypto-exchanges-philippines) — Cleared by SEC on 2 July 2026 to act as a crypto-asset intermediary inside the SEC Strategic Sandbox, subject to 90-day systems integration with a licensed local VASP
- T3[Mynt Inc.](https://www.techtimes.com/articles/329308/20261021/gcash-completes-philippines-largest-ever-ipo-raising-nearly-1-billion-debut.htm) — IPO on the Philippine Stock Exchange raising up to PHP 60.9 billion (~US$965.4 million), the largest IPO in Philippine history