#
Passporting rights, reverse-solicitation restrictions and DAC8 cross-border tax cooperation are all confirmed and in force, forming a stable cross-border picture for Ireland.
Conversely, MiCA prohibits CASPs established outside the EU from providing MiCA-regulated services to, or soliciting, EU clients including those in Ireland, even in a business-to-business context; ESMA has confirmed that the reverse-solicitation exception to this prohibition is interpreted narrowly, a Confirmed finding sourced to ESMA's own public statement on the end of MiCA transitional periods. Together these two findings frame Ireland's cross-border crypto-asset-service perimeter: inbound passporting from other EEA-authorised CASPs is straightforward, while outbound solicitation of Irish clients by non-EU firms is tightly constrained.
On the tax side, the DAC8 directive separately empowers Irish tax authorities to cooperate with counterparts and, where linked to unpaid taxes, to embargo or seize crypto-assets even where the assets or the platform holding them sit outside the taxpayer's home jurisdiction - a Confirmed finding against which no Challenger flag was raised this cycle, in contrast to the related DAC8 reporting-obligation finding in the tax-treatment module, which was downgraded to Probable for thin sourcing. This asymmetry reflects differences in how directly each fact was evidenced in the underlying reporting rather than any difference in the strength of the underlying legal basis.
Outlook
This module's findings are expected to remain stable absent a change to MiCA's passporting or reverse-solicitation provisions or a material development in DAC8 implementation. The clearest forward-looking watch item is the same institutional proposal noted in the licensing module - the ECB-backed plan to centralise supervision of large cross-border CASPs under ESMA - since any move to enactment would directly affect how cross-border passporting from an Irish CASP licence is supervised in practice.
Cross-Border Transfer
MiCA CASP authorisation granted by the Central Bank of Ireland carries EEA passporting rights, permitting an authorised firm to offer crypto-asset and related payment services across all 30 EEA states from a single Irish authorisation. This single-authorisation, multi-state-access structure is the core cross-border mechanism relevant to firms basing themselves in Ireland under MiCA, and it is illustrated concretely by Confirmo's receipt of dual MiCA and payment-institution authorisation from the Central Bank of Ireland in April 2026.
The Confirmo authorisation came ahead of a hard deadline: MiCA transitional grandfathering for crypto payment providers expires on 1 July 2026, after which unauthorised providers must cease European operations. The dual MiCA/PI structure Confirmo obtained reflects the practical reality that crypto-asset activity and payment-services activity increasingly sit under a single firm and a single Irish authorisation umbrella, with the passporting rights extending across both regulatory tracks simultaneously. For firms evaluating Ireland as a base for pan-EEA crypto-asset service provision, the combination of sole-NCA clarity from the CBI and confirmed passporting in live use is a structural advantage, though it is illustrated so far by a single named example rather than a broad pattern of dual-track authorisations.
Outlook
The 1 July 2026 grandfathering expiry is now in force, meaning any crypto payment provider not authorised by that date is required to have ceased European operations. Watch for further dual MiCA/PI authorisation decisions from the CBI following the Confirmo pattern, which would indicate Ireland is becoming a preferred base specifically for firms straddling crypto-asset and payment-services regulatory perimeters.
1 earlier distinct update(s)
Cross-Border Transfer
Ireland's cross-border posture in crypto-asset services this cycle is defined by an unusually high passporting concentration: ten of Ireland's twelve authorised CASPs passport their services to all 30 EEA states under a single CBI authorisation. This is a probable-confidence finding, and it is the clearest evidence available this cycle that Ireland functions less as a self-contained domestic crypto market and more as an export platform, with a small, concentrated cohort of firms using a single Irish authorisation as the base from which to reach the entire EEA under MiCA's Title VI passporting mechanism.
This passporting pattern is corroborated in direction by the broader authorisation data: with only 12 CASPs authorised in total, ten of which passport EEA-wide, Ireland's CASP register is both small in absolute headcount and disproportionately outward-facing relative to peer Member States with larger but more domestically-anchored registers. The mechanism itself — single-authorisation, EEA-wide passporting under MiCA — is clear and confirmed with concrete adoption data behind it, which is the basis for treating this module's underlying regulatory clarity as high even though the commercial concentration it enables raises separate questions about market structure.
Outlook
The structural question to monitor is whether this concentration deepens further as additional firms complete CASP authorisation in Ireland specifically to access EEA-wide passporting from a single base, or whether the pattern normalises as other Member States' CASP registers mature. Ireland's position as a significant export platform for crypto-asset services, rather than a purely domestic market, is the key judgment carried into subsequent cycles.
Sources and findings (4)
- T4 · The BlockMiCA CASP passporting right — A CASP authorised by the Central Bank of Ireland under MiCA may passport its crypto-asset services across all 30 EEA member states without obtaining separate national authorisations.retrieved M4bindingin force
- T1 · ESMAMiCA reverse-solicitation restriction — CASPs established outside the EU from providing MiCA-regulated services to, or soliciting, EU (including Irish) clients, including in a business-to-business context; reverse solicitation is interpreted narrowly.retrieved M4bindingin force
- T3 · CoinDeskDAC8 cross-border tax-cooperation/seizure power — embargo or seize crypto-assets even where the assets or platform sit outside the taxpayer's home jurisdiction.retrieved M3bindingin force
- T1Central Bank of Ireland — MiCA Art 65 passporting lets a CASP authorised by the CBI notify its home authority, which forwards the notification to host-state authorities within a defined period, after which cross-border services may begin.retrieved M3bindingin force