Cryptoassets Regulatory Intelligence cryptoassets.gi
US-IA · run crypto-2026-08-05 v13.3.0
content: ai_generated 13 sources retrieved model claude-sonnet-5 ·

United States – Iowa

US-IA schema crypto-v2.0.0 trajectory: not recordedregulatedoverlaps: FIM, WPM

Last updated · 8 categories · 16 sourced findings · 13 sources in the cumulative register

8Categoriesbaseline.
16Findings.claims[]
0Tier-1 sourcesrun_metadata.t1_source_count
Confidence mix (sums to 8 rendered categories; click to filter)
No categories moved this cycle.

Jurisdiction brief

No content recorded at this JID path.

8 of 8 categories
Signal
Density

Selections OR within a group, AND across groups. Press / to search.

#

Iowa has no bespoke crypto-asset licensing statute. Virtual-currency exchange, custody and money-transmission businesses fall under the state's general money-transmitter licensing law, the Iowa Uniform Money Services Act (Iowa Code Chapter 533C), administered by the Iowa Division of Banking via the Nationwide Multistate Licensing System (NMLS). Federal FinCEN MSB/money-transmitter registration applies concurrently to any exchanger or administrator of convertible virtual currency. No independent primary-source text of Chapter 533C was retrieved in this pass; the citation is corroborated only via a secondary (SEC filing exhibit) source and requires primary verification.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (3)
  1. T?source not recordedM5bindingin force
  2. T?source not recordedM5bindingin force
  3. T?source not recordedM3non-binding

#

Iowa has no state-specific token-classification statute. Whether a given crypto asset is a security, commodity, or other instrument is governed exclusively at the federal level by SEC/CFTC application of the Howey test and, for dollar-pegged payment stablecoins, by the federal GENIUS Act. Iowa's blue-sky (securities) law generally tracks federal characterization outcomes for enforcement purposes but was not independently verified in this pass.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (2)
  1. T?source not recordedM4non-binding
  2. T?source not recordedM4bindingenacted not yet effective

#

Iowa has no bespoke statute governing on-chain activities such as mining, staking, or validation. Commercial proof-of-work mining operations are physically present in Iowa (e.g., merged-mining facilities cited in SEC disclosures), but these are treated as ordinary industrial/data-center activity under general Iowa business, utility and zoning law rather than a dedicated crypto framework. Federal characterization of mining activity (SEC's 2025 statement that certain protocol mining does not itself involve the offer/sale of a security) applies uniformly.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (2)
  1. T?source not recordedM2non-binding
  2. T?source not recordedM2non-binding

#

Iowa has no state-level stablecoin issuance, reserve, or redemption framework. Stablecoin regulation in the U.S. is now anchored federally by the GENIUS Act (Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act), which imposes reserve, disclosure and redemption requirements on 'permitted payment stablecoin issuers' once its provisions take effect, applicable uniformly across states including Iowa.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (2)
  1. T?source not recordedM4bindingenacted not yet effective
  2. T?source not recordedM3non-binding

#

Iowa consumer protection enforcement against crypto-related harms has been active primarily through the Iowa Attorney General's use of the Iowa Consumer Fraud Act against crypto-ATM (kiosk) operators. The Iowa AG sued CoinFlip and Bitcoin Depot alleging failures that allowed Iowans to transfer millions of dollars to scammers through their kiosks. This enforcement-driven approach is the dominant consumer-protection vector for crypto in Iowa, rather than a bespoke statutory kiosk-disclosure regime (unlike some peer states, e.g., Illinois' Digital Asset Kiosk Act).

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (3)
  1. T?source not recordedM4bindingin force
  2. T?source not recordedM4non-binding
  3. T?source not recordedM3non-binding

#

No Iowa-specific crypto tax statute was identified in this pass. Iowa personal income tax generally conforms to the federal tax base, under which the IRS treats cryptocurrency as property, making sales, exchanges, and dispositions taxable events generating capital gains or losses. Federal broker reporting via Form 1099-DA began for 2025-year sales, increasing IRS visibility into crypto dispositions relevant to Iowa filers. Direct confirmation of Iowa Department of Revenue's specific conformity mechanics for crypto was not obtained and requires primary-source verification.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (3)
  1. T?source not recordedM4bindingin force
  2. T?source not recordedM4bindingin force
  3. T?source not recordedM3non-binding

#

No Iowa-specific cross-border crypto transfer restriction, sanctions nexus rule, or reporting threshold distinct from federal law was identified. Cross-border transfers of crypto by Iowa-based persons or entities are governed by federal OFAC sanctions programs and FinCEN's funds/travel rule framework, which apply uniformly to money transmitters regardless of state of domicile.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (1)
  1. T?source not recordedM2non-binding

#

AML/CFT obligations for crypto businesses (KYC/CDD, travel rule, SAR/STR reporting, sanctions screening, record-keeping, risk assessment) are covered under the crypto consumer's subscription to the FIM aml_ctf module and are not re-produced as claims in this baseline per the module subscription reminder. Disambiguation context only: Iowa-domiciled money transmitters dealing in convertible virtual currency are subject to FinCEN's BSA/AML framework (FIN-2013-G001, FIN-2019-G001) at the federal layer; no Iowa-specific AML statute distinct from the federal BSA regime was identified.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

No categories match.

Filters combine as OR inside a group and AND across groups.

Editorial metadata

Provenance only. Nothing below gates publication or affects the render.

Editorial metadata for United States – Iowa
FieldValue
trust.lawyer_review.statusnever_reviewed
trust.lawyer_review.reviewernot recorded
trust.content_sourceai_generated

Provenance and declared absence

Disclosure model: module cards load OPEN; standing positions render in full; sub-briefs and jurisdiction briefs load as a clamped teaser with an explicit “read full” control carrying the true word count; earlier updates stay collapsed behind a counted summary. No text is hidden without disclosing how much of it there is.

Sentinel-fed modules receive no special rendering treatment. sentinel_feed is an attribution chip only: it does not suppress content, does not generate an absence reason code, and does not exclude the module from any count, filter, search index or export on this page.

Family taxonomy is renderer-level presentation config, not a JID field. Colour is always duplicated in text and is never the sole carrier of meaning.

Suppressed by doctrine: derived risk score; per-module RAG traffic light; derived_scores = {}.

Band honesty: uncertainty bands are computed against a frozen build clock of 2026-08-17. A year-precision row is never promoted into a tighter band.

Orphan deltas: 0 cycle_delta row(s) target non-module objects and are listed in the rail rather than attached to a card.

Envelope: baseline resolved at jurisdiction_json.baseline; 8 module(s), 16 finding(s), 13 source(s) in the cumulative register.