Cryptoassets Regulatory Intelligence cryptoassets.gi
UY · run crypto-2026-08-06 v13.3.0
content: ai_generated 8 sources retrieved model claude-sonnet-5 ·

Uruguay

UY schema crypto-v2.0.0 trajectory: not recordedin transitionoverlaps: FIM, WPM

Last updated · 8 categories · 16 sourced findings · 8 sources in the cumulative register

8Categoriesbaseline.
16Findings.claims[]
0Tier-1 sourcesrun_metadata.t1_source_count
Confidence mix (sums to 8 rendered categories; click to filter)
No categories moved this cycle.

Jurisdiction brief

No content recorded at this JID path.

8 of 8 categories
Signal
Density

Selections OR within a group, AND across groups. Press / to search.

#

Uruguay brought virtual-asset service providers (VASPs) within the Banco Central del Uruguay (BCU) regulatory perimeter via Ley N.º 20.345 (19 September 2024), which amended Article 37 of the BCU's Carta Orgánica (Ley N.º 16.696) to add 'los proveedores de servicios sobre activos virtuales' (literal H) and 'los emisores de activos virtuales estables' (literal C) as entities regulated and supervised by the Superintendencia de Servicios Financieros (SSF). The implementing regulation specifying registration/licensing mechanics — distinguishing Proveedores de Servicios de Activos Virtuales Financieros (PSAVF) from Proveedores de Servicios de Activos Virtuales No Financieros (PSAVNF) — was published for public consultation on 21 August 2025 with comments due by 19 September 2025; its final, in-force text has not been independently confirmed as of the research date. A separate BCU Board proposal (Resolución D/248/2025, 11 August 2025) sent to the Ministry of Economy and Finance seeks further legislative expansion of the regulatory perimeter. Prior to the 2024 law, BCU/SSF explicitly stated that crypto intermediation activity was not regulated by the Central Bank.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (4)
  1. T?source not recordedM5bindingin force
  2. T?source not recordedM4non-binding
  3. T?source not recordedM3non-binding
  4. T?source not recordedM2non-binding

#

BCU's non-binding 'Marco conceptual para el tratamiento de Activos Virtuales' categorizes virtual assets by economic substance into: AV de Seguridad (security-like, potentially falling under existing securities law Art. 13 Ley 18.627), AV de Utilidad (utility, no issuance authorization required), AV Estable (stable, treated analogously to electronic-money issuance), and AV de Intercambio (exchange-type, e.g. Bitcoin/Ether, no issuance authorization required). Separately, Ley N.º 20.345 gives binding legal effect to the inclusion of 'emisores de activos virtuales estables' (stablecoin issuers) within the BCU/SSF perimeter.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (4)
  1. T?source not recordedM5bindingin force
  2. T?source not recordedM3non-binding
  3. T?source not recordedM2non-binding
  4. T?source not recordedM2non-binding

#

No BCU or other Uruguayan regulator publication was identified that specifically addresses staking, DeFi lending, DEX operation, mining, node operation, validator activity, or tokenization as discrete regulated on-chain activities. The regulatory perimeter established by Ley N.º 20.345 and the PSAV draft regulation is framed around service-provider intermediation (exchange, transfer, custody, administration) rather than protocol-level on-chain activity categories.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (1)
  1. T?source not recordedM1non-binding

#

Ley N.º 20.345 explicitly brought 'emisores de activos virtuales estables' within the BCU/SSF regulatory perimeter (Article 37, literal C, as amended). BCU's non-binding conceptual framework further describes stable-virtual-asset issuers as analogous to electronic-money issuers: holders obtain rights over any backing reserve assets, and the issuer commits to honour redemption requests. No dedicated reserve-requirement, disclosure, or systemic-designation rule specific to stablecoins beyond this e-money analogy was located, and the binding implementing regulation for stablecoin issuers (distinct from the PSAV consultation) was not confirmed as finalized.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (2)
  1. T?source not recordedM5bindingin force
  2. T?source not recordedM3non-binding

#

The August 2025 draft PSAV regulation differentiates the regulatory and supervisory focus by provider type: PSAVF (financial virtual-asset providers) are proposed to be subject to both consumer-protection rules and AML/CFT/proliferation-financing rules, whereas PSAVNF (non-financial virtual-asset providers) are proposed to be subject only to AML/CFT/proliferation-financing rules. Separately, BCU's 2021 public communique issued non-binding risk-disclosure recommendations to users and the general public regarding virtual-asset volatility, custody risk, and counterparty risk, noting financial institutions are not obliged to process virtual-asset transactions.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (2)
  1. T?source not recordedM2non-binding
  2. T?source not recordedM3non-binding

#

No crypto-specific tax instrument (IRAE, IRPF, VAT/IVA, withholding, or crypto-specific reporting obligation) issued by Uruguay's Dirección General Impositiva (DGI) or Ministry of Economy and Finance was located during this research pass. Uruguay's general source-based tax system (Uruguayan-source income rules under IRAE/IRPF) would presumptively apply to crypto-derived income under general principles, but no primary source confirming specific application to virtual assets was found.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (1)
  1. T?source not recordedM2non-binding

#

No Uruguay-specific crypto cross-border transfer restriction, sanctions nexus rule, reporting threshold, or crypto travel-rule cross-border regime was identified in this research pass. Uruguay generally maintains open capital-account policy, but no primary source was located confirming or denying a crypto-specific cross-border control regime distinct from the general VASP perimeter established by Ley N.º 20.345.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (1)
  1. T?source not recordedM2non-binding

#

Crypto AML/CFT obligations for Uruguay are covered under the shared Financial Integrity Module (FIM) 'aml_ctf' subscription and are intentionally NOT reproduced as claims in this crypto baseline per fleet doctrine. Contextually, the draft PSAV regulation (August 2025 consultation) applies AML/CFT/proliferation-financing obligations to both PSAVF and PSAVNF providers, and Ley N.º 20.345 situates VASPs within the SSF's supervisory perimeter, which historically has included AML/CFT control functions for regulated financial entities.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (1)
  1. T?source not recordedM1non-binding
No categories match.

Filters combine as OR inside a group and AND across groups.

Editorial metadata

Provenance only. Nothing below gates publication or affects the render.

Editorial metadata for Uruguay
FieldValue
trust.lawyer_review.statusnever_reviewed
trust.lawyer_review.reviewernot recorded
trust.content_sourceai_generated

Provenance and declared absence

Disclosure model: module cards load OPEN; standing positions render in full; sub-briefs and jurisdiction briefs load as a clamped teaser with an explicit “read full” control carrying the true word count; earlier updates stay collapsed behind a counted summary. No text is hidden without disclosing how much of it there is.

Sentinel-fed modules receive no special rendering treatment. sentinel_feed is an attribution chip only: it does not suppress content, does not generate an absence reason code, and does not exclude the module from any count, filter, search index or export on this page.

Family taxonomy is renderer-level presentation config, not a JID field. Colour is always duplicated in text and is never the sole carrier of meaning.

Suppressed by doctrine: derived risk score; per-module RAG traffic light; derived_scores = {}.

Band honesty: uncertainty bands are computed against a frozen build clock of 2026-08-17. A year-precision row is never promoted into a tighter band.

Orphan deltas: 0 cycle_delta row(s) target non-module objects and are listed in the rail rather than attached to a card.

Envelope: baseline resolved at jurisdiction_json.baseline; 8 module(s), 16 finding(s), 8 source(s) in the cumulative register.