Cryptoassets Regulatory Intelligence cryptoassets.gi
US-KS v13.3.0
content: ai_generated legal review: never_reviewed (informational) publication gate: 0 failing16 sources retrieved model claude-sonnet-5 · 2026-08-06

Kansas, USA

US-KS schema crypto-v2.0.0 trajectory: not yet assessedin transitionoverlaps: FIM, WPM

Last updated · 8 categories · 20 sourced findings · 31 sources in the cumulative register

8Categoriesbaseline.
20Findings.claims[]
9Tier-1 sourcesrun_metadata.t1_source_count
Confidence mix (sums to 8 rendered categories; click to filter)
No categories moved this cycle.

United States federal law that applies in Kansas, USA is covered once, on the United States page. This page covers Kansas, USA’s own layer: its own law, regulators and enforcement.

Jurisdiction lead brief

Latest update · 18 October 2026

Lead Signal

Kansas has closed a longstanding gap in its crypto-kiosk oversight. The Virtual Currency Kiosk Consumer Protection Act, enacted as 2026 HB 2591, brings virtual-currency kiosk operators under the Kansas Money Transmission Act, deeming kiosk operation money transmission under K.S.A. 2025 Supp. 9-564 and requiring licensure effective 1 July 2026. The Act closed a prior two-party-exchange exemption that had left kiosk operators outside state money-transmission licensure altogether. A transitional window allowed unlicensed operators as of 1 July 2026 to apply for licensure within sixty days, with continued operation permitted pending the Office of the State Bank Commissioner's review of a complete application. The first enforcement precedent under the new regime arrived quickly: on 8 October 2026, Coinme Inc. entered a thirty-three state, 2.5 million dollar settlement for Bank Secrecy Act and anti-money-laundering violations, and agreed to exit Kansas kiosk operations entirely by 1 January 2027 or face a further four million dollar penalty.

8 of 8 categories
Signal
Density

Selections OR within a group, AND across groups. Press / to search.

#

Kansas has no bespoke crypto-asset licence. Following HB 2591 (2026 Ch. 102), virtual-currency kiosk operation is expressly deemed money transmission, requiring a Kansas money-transmitter licence via NMLS/OSBC.

Standing sub-brief · as of 25 August 2026242 words · last cycle 2026-10-18

Crypto Licensing

Kansas has newly and explicitly deemed virtual currency kiosk operation, marketing, or facilitation to be money transmission requiring licensure under the Kansas Money Transmission Act, through House Bill 2591, effective 1 July 2026. Any person who owns, operates, solicits, markets, advertises, or facilitates a kiosk in Kansas must now hold a licence, with unlicensed operators as of the effective date given a 60-day window to apply. Kiosk operators are separately required to submit quarterly location reports to the Office of the State Bank Commissioner within 45 days of each calendar quarter's end, giving the regulator a standing visibility mechanism over the kiosk population that did not previously exist. This is an extension of the pre-existing, broader Kansas Money Transmission Act licensing perimeter to a specific, previously unlicensed kiosk channel; general crypto-exchange and custody activity continues to be governed by that same broader statutory definition, which itself remains undifferentiated by token type. The finding is corroborated by the enrolled Kansas Register text and the OSBC's own implementation guidance, both confirming the 1 July 2026 effective date and the licensing mechanism.

Periodic update · new data 2026-10-18

Crypto Licensing

Kansas's crypto-licensing framework moved materially this cycle with the entry into force of the Virtual Currency Kiosk Consumer Protection Act, 2026 HB 2591, effective 1 July 2026. The Act requires licensure before offering virtual-currency kiosk services, deeming such activity money transmission under K.S.A. 2025 Supp. 9-564, and in doing so closes a prior two-party-exchange exemption that had left kiosk operators outside the Kansas Money Transmission Act's licensure requirement. The primary framework is now the Kansas Money Transmission Act (K.S.A. 9-555 et seq.), as amended by the 2026 Act, with the Office of the State Bank Commissioner as supervisory authority. A transitional provision addressed operators already active as of the 1 July 2026 effective date: such operators had sixty days to apply for licensure, and were permitted to continue operating while OSBC reviewed a complete application, avoiding an abrupt market disruption at the point of transition.

The regime's first enforcement test followed within months. On 8 October 2026, Coinme Inc. entered a thirty-three state, 2.5 million dollar settlement addressing Bank Secrecy Act and anti-money-laundering violations, with Kansas as one of the settling jurisdictions. As part of the settlement, Coinme must exit Kansas kiosk operations by 1 January 2027 or face an additional four million dollar penalty. This settlement is the first visible enforcement precedent operating under the new VCKCPA licensing gateway, and establishes that noncompliance with the new money-transmission and AML framework for kiosk operators carries a swift and substantial financial and market-access consequence rather than a purely prospective licensing requirement.

Kansas still has no comprehensive crypto-exchange or custody licensing regime distinct from general money transmission; the new framework addresses the kiosk channel specifically rather than digital-asset businesses as a class.

Outlook

The sixty-day transitional licensure window has closed, and the Office of the State Bank Commissioner's ongoing review of kiosk-operator applications, together with the market response to the Coinme settlement, will determine the practical shape of the kiosk sector going into 2027. Whether additional kiosk operators pursue the Coinme path of settlement-and-exit or instead secure licensure under the new regime is the principal near-term question for this module.

2 earlier distinct update(s)
Periodic update · new data 2026-10-11

Crypto Licensing

Kansas's Virtual Currency Kiosk Consumer Protection Act (HB 2591) deems any person who owns, operates, solicits, markets, advertises or facilitates a virtual-currency kiosk in Kansas to be engaged in money transmission, requiring licensure under K.S.A. 2025 Supp. 9-564. The obligation is in force as of 1 July 2026. Unlicensed incumbent kiosk operators were required to apply for a money-transmitter licence within 60 days of that effective date, and the Act permits them to continue operating while the Office of the State Bank Commissioner reviews their application, avoiding an enforcement cliff at the moment of commencement. This is a structural extension of the existing Kansas Money Transmission Act licensing gateway to a previously unaddressed category of crypto-asset business, rather than the creation of a parallel, crypto-specific licensing regime. Whether Kansas's general money-transmission licensing requirement reaches non-kiosk crypto exchange or custody businesses on the same terms as kiosk operators has not been confirmed. No administrative fine or criminal-penalty figure for operating a kiosk without a licence after the 60-day application window lapsed has been located.

Outlook

The principal item to track is confirmation of how many incumbent kiosk operators applied within the 60-day window and whether the Office of the State Bank Commissioner has begun licensing action against those that did not. Separately, clarification of whether the general Money Transmission Act licensing requirement extends to non-kiosk crypto businesses would materially broaden or narrow the practical reach of Kansas's crypto-licensing perimeter.

Periodic update · new data 2026-09-28

Crypto Licensing

Kansas's crypto-licensing regime tightened materially this cycle with the entry into force of 2026 HB 2591, the Virtual Currency Kiosk Consumer Protection Act, on July 1, 2026. The statute amends the Kansas Money Transmission Act (K.S.A. 9-508 et seq.) so that any person owning, operating, soliciting, marketing, advertising, or facilitating virtual-currency kiosks in Kansas is deemed to be engaged in money transmission and must obtain licensure from the Kansas Office of the State Bank Commissioner. The Kansas Register's enrolled text is explicit that the new section is part of and supplemental to the Kansas Money Transmission Act, confirming this as a binding statutory amendment rather than mere guidance.

This licensing tightening is narrow in scope rather than comprehensive. It applies specifically to the kiosk product category, meaning unattended physical machines that facilitate virtual-currency transactions. Outside that category, the OSBC's standing 2014 interpretive guidance continues to apply: an entity engaged solely in the transmission of decentralized cryptocurrency, with no fiat leg, is not required to obtain a license in Kansas, since the KMTA does not apply to transmission of decentralized cryptocurrencies alone. Kansas Legislative Research Department materials corroborate that Kansas statute does not consider cryptocurrency money, so the exchange of one cryptocurrency for another does not itself count as money transmission.

The resulting picture is a jurisdiction with two coexisting rules for what is functionally similar underlying activity: a newly-licensed, closely-supervised kiosk channel, and a still-exempt peer-to-peer decentralized-transmission channel. Kansas-licensed money transmitters, including now-licensed kiosk operators, are also generally expected to register with FinCEN as money services businesses and to maintain a BSA/AML compliance program, layering a federal obligation on top of the new state licensing duty.

Outlook

Whether the new licensure requirement has yet produced any actual OSBC-issued kiosk-operator licences remains unestablished this cycle. That question, together with whether the OSBC will revisit its 2014 decentralized-cryptocurrency exemption in light of the kiosk carve-out, are the two clearest markers to watch for whether Kansas's split licensing structure holds or converges toward a broader crypto-transmission perimeter.

1 further periodic run re-emitted the standing brief unchanged and is not shown.

Sources and findings (3)
  1. T1 · FinCENFinCEN — An administrator or exchanger of convertible virtual currency that accepts and transmits, or buys or sells, convertible virtual currency is a money transmitter under federal FinCEN regulations and must register as a money services business unless an exemption applies.retrieved M4bindingin force
  2. T3 · U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (EDGAR filer disclosure)U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (EDGAR filer disclosure) — The Kansas Office of the State Bank Commissioner has historically found that bitcoin does not constitute money, and that mere transmission of bitcoin does not constitute money transmission requiring state licensure.retrieved M4non-bindingour coverage gap, expected to resolve on a re-run
  3. T2 · Conference of State Bank Supervisors (CSBS)Conference of State Bank Supervisors (CSBS) — Money transmission businesses operating in Kansas, including those transmitting value on behalf of customers, are generally required to hold a Kansas money transmitter license administered through the NMLS multistate system unless a specific state-recognized exemption applies.retrieved M3bindingin force

#

Token characterisation in Kansas follows federal SEC/CFTC frameworks; there is no Kansas-specific token taxonomy. The SEC has moved through 2025-2026 to formalize a Howey-test-anchored taxonomy distinguishing security tokens from digital commodities, collectibles, digital tools and payment stablecoins, while reiterating that tokenized securities remain securities. The GENIUS Act (federal, 2025) separately confirms that qualifying payment stablecoins are not securities.

Standing sub-brief · as of 11 October 2026182 words · last cycle 2026-10-11

Token Classification

The Virtual Currency Kiosk Consumer Protection Act introduces a functional definition of 'virtual currency' for purposes of the Act: a digital representation of value used as a medium of exchange, unit of account or store of value that is not money, with certain affinity or rewards-program value expressly excluded. This definition is scoped narrowly to the money-transmission licensing context created by the Act and does not establish a general state-level test for classifying tokens as securities or for any other regulatory purpose. Kansas does not otherwise have a state-level securities-classification framework for digital assets identified in the sources reviewed. The practical effect of the new definition is to settle, for licensing purposes only, which kiosk-dispensed instruments trigger the money-transmitter obligation, while leaving the broader classification question for other token types unresolved under Kansas law.

no periodic updates on record for this sub-brief

Sources and findings (3)
  1. T1 · U.S. Securities and Exchange CommissionU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission — Crypto assets that meet the prongs of the Howey investment-contract test are securities under federal law and fall within SEC oversight, while most crypto assets are not themselves securities absent an accompanying investment contract.retrieved M5bindingin force
  2. T1 · U.S. Securities and Exchange CommissionU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission — The SEC anticipates establishing a formal token taxonomy anchored in the Howey test to delineate categories such as network tokens, digital tools, digital collectibles and tokenized securities, with this taxonomy still under active development as of late 2025.retrieved M3non-binding
  3. T1 · U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (Commissioner Peirce)U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (Commissioner Peirce) — The GENIUS Act confirms that qualifying payment stablecoins are not securities under federal law.retrieved M4bindingenacted not yet effective

#

No Kansas-specific regulation of mining, staking, node operation, validator activity, DeFi/dex participation or tokenization was identified. Activity in this space is governed exclusively by evolving federal SEC/CFTC staff positions, which have moved toward treating certain proof-of-work mining and protocol staking as generally administrative/ministerial and therefore outside Howey's 'efforts of others' prong, though these remain non-binding staff statements rather than codified rules.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

no periodic updates on record for this sub-brief

Sources and findings (3)
  1. T1 · U.S. Securities and Exchange CommissionU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission — SEC staff have issued a statement addressing certain proof-of-work mining activities, informing the analysis of whether such activities involve securities transactions under Howey.retrieved M2non-binding
  2. T1 · U.S. Securities and Exchange CommissionU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission — SEC Division of Corporation Finance has issued a statement on certain protocol staking activities, informing whether custodial and non-custodial staking arrangements involve the offer or sale of investment contract securities under Howey.retrieved M2non-binding
  3. T2 · Conference of State Bank Supervisors (CSBS)Conference of State Bank Supervisors (CSBS) — No Kansas state-level or Kansas-specific federal on-chain regulation of DeFi lending, DEX operation, node operation or tokenization activity was identified in this research pass.retrieved M2non-bindinga fact about the regime

#

Kansas has no state-level stablecoin statute. The controlling framework is federal: the GENIUS Act (signed July 18, 2025) establishes the first comprehensive U.S. federal payment-stablecoin regime, restricting issuance to permitted issuers, mandating 1:1 high-quality liquid reserves, par redemption, and monthly disclosure. As of the research date, implementing rules from the OCC, FDIC, Federal Reserve, NCUA and Treasury remain proposals; the statutory one-year rulemaking deadline (July 18, 2026) was missed, and operative provisions take effect on the earlier of 120 days after final implementing regulations or January 18, 2027.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

no periodic updates on record for this sub-brief

Sources and findings (5)
  1. T1 · Federal Reserve BoardFederal Reserve Board — Under the GENIUS Act, only permitted entities -- federally chartered bank subsidiaries, OCC-supervised nonbank issuers, and state-qualified issuers operating under a certified 'substantially similar' state regime -- may issue payment stablecoins to U.S. customers.retrieved M4bindingenacted not yet effective
  2. T1 · Federal Reserve BoardFederal Reserve Board — Permitted payment stablecoin issuers under the GENIUS Act must back every stablecoin one-to-one with high-quality liquid reserves such as insured deposits, short-term U.S. Treasury securities, and Federal Reserve balances.retrieved M5bindingenacted not yet effective
  3. T4 · The BlockThe Block — Permitted payment stablecoin issuers must support redemption of stablecoins at par on demand, with implementing proposals specifying redemption generally within two business days.retrieved M4bindingenacted not yet effective
  4. T1 · Federal Reserve BoardFederal Reserve Board — GENIUS Act permitted issuers must publish monthly reserve composition disclosures, with issuers exceeding $50 billion in outstanding issuance also required to publish audited annual financials under GAAP.retrieved M3bindingenacted not yet effective
  5. T4 · The BlockThe Block — As of the research date, federal regulators (OCC, FDIC, NCUA, Federal Reserve, Treasury) had missed the GENIUS Act's one-year statutory deadline for finalizing implementing regulations, leaving final systemic and prudential standards unsettled.retrieved M3non-binding

#

Kansas has no crypto-specific consumer-protection statute. The Kansas Office of the Securities Commissioner issued a public investor warning in January 2018 flagging risks in cryptocurrency and ICO investments, including fraud red flags, but this is a general risk-disclosure advisory rather than a binding rule creating custody, suitability, or marketing-restriction obligations specific to crypto.

Standing sub-brief · as of 25 August 2026146 words · last cycle 2026-10-18

Consumer Protection

House Bill 2591's Virtual Currency Kiosk Consumer Protection Act imposes mandatory point-of-transaction disclosures on kiosk operators: an on-screen warning, requiring customer acknowledgment, that virtual currency is not government-backed, is volatile, and that completed transactions may be irreversible. The statute additionally caps fees on kiosk transactions at the greater of five dollars or eighteen percent of the transaction amount, with a further one-thousand-dollar cap on an initial transaction. These are new, explicit consumer-protection provisions squarely addressing the crypto-ATM fraud vector, an area that had previously lacked kiosk-specific regulation in Kansas, and they take effect on the same 1 July 2026 timeline as the licensing extension.

Periodic update · new data 2026-10-18

Consumer Protection

Kansas's crypto consumer-protection position tightened this cycle, but only within the virtual-currency kiosk channel. The Virtual Currency Kiosk Consumer Protection Act, 2026 HB 2591, effective 1 July 2026, requires kiosk operators to provide disclosure receipts that cover liability for non-delivery of purchased virtual currency, the operator's refund policy, and the complete destination wallet address associated with any kiosk transaction. These obligations sit alongside the Act's fee-cap provisions for the kiosk channel, together forming a meaningful, if narrow, consumer-protection layer where none previously existed for this specific product category.

The protections are confined to the kiosk channel. Kansas has no broader crypto-asset consumer-protection statute addressing exchanges, custodial wallet providers, lending platforms, or other digital-asset services operating outside the physical kiosk context. A consumer transacting through a Kansas-based crypto exchange or custodial service not structured as a kiosk operation receives no equivalent statutory disclosure or refund protection under current Kansas law.

The practical effect of the new disclosure regime is to give kiosk users a documented statutory entitlement to transaction transparency, including destination-wallet confirmation, that was previously absent, at the same time that the related licensing tightening (see Crypto Licensing) raises the compliance bar for operators serving that channel.

Outlook

The disclosure, refund, and fee-cap requirements took effect 1 July 2026 and apply now to all licensed kiosk operators. Whether Kansas extends any comparable consumer-protection framework to crypto products outside the kiosk channel remains unaddressed and is not indicated by any pending legislative or regulatory signal in this cycle's evidence base.

2 earlier distinct update(s)
Periodic update · new data 2026-10-11

Consumer Protection

The Virtual Currency Kiosk Consumer Protection Act imposes a new disclosure duty on kiosk operators: prior to a Kansas resident's initial virtual-currency transaction, the operator must disclose, in clear, conspicuous and legible English writing, certain terms, conditions and fraud-risk information. This obligation is in force as of 1 July 2026, alongside the Act's money-transmitter licensing requirement. The Act is reported to also impose a fee cap on kiosk transaction charges and anti-fraud identity measures, forming a meaningful, if narrowly kiosk-specific, consumer-protection layer. No broader Kansas regime addressing custody standards, market-abuse conduct, or general crypto-consumer redress beyond the kiosk channel has been identified; the state's consumer-protection posture for digital assets remains concentrated at the physical kiosk point of transaction rather than extending across custodial or exchange-based crypto business models.

Outlook

The disclosure and fee-cap provisions took effect alongside the licensing requirement on 1 July 2026; the item to watch is whether Kansas enforcement activity under these provisions, or any extension of comparable consumer protections to non-kiosk crypto business models, becomes visible in subsequent reporting.

Periodic update · new data 2026-09-28

Consumer Protection

Kansas introduced its first crypto-specific consumer-protection regime this cycle through 2026 HB 2591, the Virtual Currency Kiosk Consumer Protection Act, which took effect July 1, 2026 as part of the Kansas Money Transmission Act. The Act establishes refund rights for kiosk users and a defined, limited carve-out permitting operators to delay a required refund. Specifically, kiosk operators may delay a required refund under reasonable suspicion of fraud only if that suspicion is immediately reported to the Commissioner, the Attorney General, or law enforcement, and the delay may last only until that reporting agency concludes its investigation. This is a confirmed, binding provision, sourced directly from the Kansas Register enrolled bill text, and it represents a genuinely new consumer safeguard rather than an extension of an existing one, since Kansas previously had no crypto-specific consumer-protection statute at all.

The new regime is explicitly scoped to the kiosk product category that HB 2591 also newly licenses, meaning the consumer-protection obligations and the licensing obligations arrived in the same statutory vehicle and apply to the same population of regulated entities. This pairing is significant: Kansas is not merely requiring kiosk operators to register, it is simultaneously constraining how those operators may treat consumer funds once registered, closing what had been an unregulated space for physical crypto-cash conversion machines.

Outlook

The near-term marker to watch is enforcement practice: whether the Commissioner, Attorney General, or law enforcement receive and process any fraud-suspicion reports under the new refund-delay carve-out, and whether the consumer-protection regime is extended by future legislation beyond the kiosk category to other crypto-facing consumer touchpoints in Kansas.

1 further periodic run re-emitted the standing brief unchanged and is not shown.

Sources and findings (1)
  1. T1 · Kansas Office of the Securities CommissionerKansas Office of the Securities Commissioner — The Kansas Office of the Securities Commissioner issued a public statement warning that investments in cryptocurrencies, including ICOs and crypto futures contracts, are not government-insured and carry substantial investment risk.retrieved M2non-binding

#

Kansas has no distinct state-level published guidance on digital-asset taxation identified in this pass; state income tax treatment of crypto gains presumably follows federal adjusted gross income conformity but this has not been independently verified against Kansas Department of Revenue guidance. At the federal level, the IRS treats digital assets as property (not currency), making sales and exchanges taxable events subject to capital gains treatment, and has introduced Form 1099-DA broker reporting for the 2025 tax year onward, with the first forms due by February 17, 2026.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

no periodic updates on record for this sub-brief

Sources and findings (2)
  1. T3 · U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (EDGAR filer disclosure)U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (EDGAR filer disclosure) — Current IRS guidance treats digital assets such as bitcoin as property for federal tax purposes, meaning sales and exchanges are taxable events generally subject to capital gains treatment.retrieved M4bindingin force
  2. T3 · CoinDeskCoinDesk — Crypto brokers such as exchanges are required to issue Form 1099-DA reporting gross proceeds from digital asset sales and exchanges to both customers and the IRS, with the first forms covering 2025-tax-year transactions due by February 17, 2026, and cost-basis reporting beginning with the 2026 tax year.retrieved M4bindingin force

#

Kansas imposes no state-specific outbound restriction on cross-border crypto asset transfers. Cross-border crypto activity is governed by federal frameworks: BSA/FinCEN Travel Rule obligations (with a pending proposal to lower the international funds-transfer recordkeeping threshold from $3,000 to $250 for transfers involving convertible virtual currency), OFAC sanctions screening, and, for stablecoin issuers, GENIUS Act BSA/sanctions compliance obligations.

Standing sub-brief · as of 25 August 2026127 words · last cycle 2026-08-21

Cross-Border Transfer

Kansas imposes no state-specific restriction on cross-border virtual-currency transfers; such matters continue to be governed exclusively by the federal Bank Secrecy Act framework as applied to licensed money transmitters. The practical effect of House Bill 2591's new kiosk-licensing requirement is to bring a previously unlicensed cash-in and cash-out channel under that federal BSA framework by extension of the new state money-transmitter licensure, rather than through any direct state-level cross-border rule change. No dedicated Kansas cross-border virtual-currency transfer statute exists as of this cycle.

No new data since the standing brief. 1 periodic run re-emitted it unchanged.

Sources and findings (3)
  1. T2 · Conference of State Bank Supervisors (CSBS)Conference of State Bank Supervisors (CSBS) — Kansas imposes no state-specific outbound restriction on crypto asset cross-border transfers beyond the federal AML/sanctions framework applicable to money transmitters generally.retrieved M2non-binding
  2. T1 · Federal Reserve BoardFederal Reserve Board — GENIUS Act permitted payment stablecoin issuers must comply with the Bank Secrecy Act and U.S. sanctions rules as a condition of federal authorization.retrieved M4bindingenacted not yet effective
  3. T1 · Federal Reserve Board / FinCENFederal Reserve Board / FinCEN — Federal regulators have proposed reducing the Recordkeeping and Travel Rule threshold from $3,000 to $250 for funds transfers and transmittals, including those involving convertible virtual currency, that begin or end outside the United States; this proposal is not yet finalized.retrieved M3non-binding

#

Crypto AML/CFT obligations are handled via the fleet's FIM aml_ctf module subscription and are intentionally excluded from this baseline per module-subscription doctrine. Contextually, Kansas crypto businesses that qualify as money transmitters remain subject to federal BSA obligations (FinCEN MSB registration, SAR/CTR filing, recordkeeping) administered by FinCEN; these are captured under the FIM aml_ctf feed rather than restated here.

Rules for crypto-asset service providers · from Sentinel.gi · verified 2026-07-05
  • 2026 HB 2591, New Sec. 6(g)(1) — Any virtual currency kiosk operator who owns, operates, solicits, markets, advertises or facilitates virtual currency kiosks in Kansas is deemed engaged in money transmission and must hold a Kansas money-transmitter licence. (in force; in force 2026-07-01; deadline 60 days after 2026-07-01 for incumbent unlicensed operators) source, 2026-04-30

Not yet covered by Sentinel.gi for this jurisdiction: suspicious transaction reporting for CASPs: recipient FIUs, deadlines, consent or moratorium periods, account freezes, suspension duties and recognition criteria; sanctions asset freezes as distinct from AML reporting, sectoral crypto-service bans, designation list sources and crypto-relevant designations; travel rule obligations: thresholds and currency, data sets, self-hosted wallet tests, binding status of guidance and repeated-failure reporting channels; prohibitions on anonymous accounts and anonymity-enhancing assets and their application dates; wallet-address screening and on- and off-chain transaction monitoring requirements and supervisory expectations; recent changes to crypto-transfer AML instruments, including revocations and replacements.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

no periodic updates on record for this sub-brief

No categories match.

Filters combine as OR inside a group and AND across groups.

Publication gate

No failing checks.

schema_validpass
min_quoted_text_presentwaived — floor 0%
egress_verifiedpass
every_practical_object_has_source_idn/a — no subject in this jurisdiction
source_tier_integrity_okpass
jurisdiction_source_floor_metpass
tier_a_b_national_primary_pct62.5
aggregator_only_jurisdiction_count0
manual_override

Editorial metadata

Provenance only. Nothing below gates publication or affects the render.

Editorial metadata for Kansas, USA
FieldValue
trust.lawyer_review.statusnever_reviewed
trust.lawyer_review.reviewerno reviewer on record
trust.content_sourceai_generated

Provenance and declared absence

Disclosure model: module cards load OPEN; standing positions render in full; sub-briefs and jurisdiction briefs load as a clamped teaser with an explicit “read full” control carrying the true word count; earlier updates stay collapsed behind a counted summary. No text is hidden without disclosing how much of it there is.

Sentinel-fed modules receive no special rendering treatment. sentinel_feed is an attribution chip only: it does not suppress content, does not generate an absence reason code, and does not exclude the module from any count, filter, search index or export on this page.

Family taxonomy is renderer-level presentation config, not a JID field. Colour is always duplicated in text and is never the sole carrier of meaning.

Suppressed by doctrine: derived risk score; per-module RAG traffic light; derived_scores = {}.

Band honesty: uncertainty bands are computed against a frozen build clock of 2026-10-20. A year-precision row is never promoted into a tighter band.

Orphan deltas: 0 cycle_delta row(s) target non-module objects and are listed in the rail rather than attached to a card.

Envelope: baseline resolved at jurisdiction_json.baseline; 8 module(s), 20 finding(s), 31 source(s) in the cumulative register.

Think something on this page is wrong? Report an error.