Cryptoassets Regulatory Intelligence cryptoassets.gi
US-LA v13.3.0
content: ai_generated legal review: never_reviewed (informational) publication gate: 0 failing7 sources retrieved model claude-sonnet-5 · 2026-08-06

Louisiana, USA

US-LA schema crypto-v2.0.0 trajectory: not yet assessedregulatedoverlaps: FIM

Last updated · 8 categories · 16 sourced findings · 18 sources in the cumulative register

8Categoriesbaseline.
16Findings.claims[]
6Tier-1 sourcesrun_metadata.t1_source_count
Confidence mix (sums to 8 rendered categories; click to filter)
No categories moved this cycle.

United States federal law that applies in Louisiana, USA is covered once, on the United States page. This page covers Louisiana, USA’s own layer: its own law, regulators and enforcement.

Jurisdiction lead brief

Latest update · 18 October 2026

Lead Signal

Louisiana's Virtual Currency Businesses Act had its sunset clause repealed by Act 923 (SB163), effective 1 August 2026, removing the 1 July 2027 expiry that previously sat over the state's standalone VASP licensing regime and adding a federal-preemption-trigger clause under which VCBA provisions would become null and void to the extent a future federal licensure law preempts them, effective the last day of the calendar year that federal law takes effect. This resolves what had been a live sunset-risk question for the roughly three dozen licensees the Office of Financial Institutions currently supervises under the Act, and signals that Louisiana intends its virtual-currency licensing framework to persist as standing infrastructure rather than a time-limited pilot.

8 of 8 categories
Signal
Density

Selections OR within a group, AND across groups. Press / to search.

#

Louisiana operates a bespoke, crypto-specific licensing regime administered by the Office of Financial Institutions (OFI), separate from — and layered on top of — the state's general money-transmitter law. OFI's non-depository division maintains distinct license/registration categories for 'Virtual Currency Business Activity' and a lighter-touch 'Notification Filers' track, consistent with the two-tier (full license vs. notification-only for small-volume actors) structure originally proposed in the state's virtual-currency licensing bill. Businesses that already hold a comparable license from another state with reciprocal recognition, or individuals under a de minimis annual transaction threshold, may qualify for the notification-only track rather than full licensure. The general Louisiana money transmitter statute (bond, fee, and fitness requirements) continues to apply in parallel to entities whose activity is characterized as money transmission.

Standing sub-brief · as of 25 August 2026134 words · last cycle 2026-10-18

Crypto Licensing

Senate Bill 185 (Act 331) rescinded the prior license-exception provision under the Louisiana Virtual Currency Businesses Act, so any person exchanging, transferring, or storing virtual currency for Louisiana customers, or operating a custodial wallet or exchange serving Louisiana users, must now hold a Louisiana virtual-currency-business license with no volume-based exemption. Simultaneously, the Blockchain Basics Act exempts self-custody of digital assets and home digital-asset mining from additional state licensing requirements. The result is a dual-track regime: strict licensing for custodial and exchange business coexists with deregulatory protection for self-custody and home mining, both supervised by the Louisiana Office of Financial Institutions.

Periodic update · new data 2026-10-18

Crypto Licensing

Louisiana's Virtual Currency Businesses Act requires any person engaging in virtual currency business activity with Louisiana residents to hold a licence from the Office of Financial Institutions; engaging in such activity without a licence has been prohibited since 1 July 2023. This cycle's material development is Act 923 (SB163), effective 1 August 2026, which repeals the VCBA's previously scheduled 1 July 2027 sunset date and adds a federal-preemption-trigger clause: VCBA provisions that are preempted by a future federal virtual-currency licensure law become null and void to that extent, effective the last day of the calendar year in which the federal law takes effect. The repeal of the sunset date removes what had been a time-limited quality to the state's standalone licensing regime, converting it into standing infrastructure for the licensee base OFI currently supervises.

A second, related development under the same legislative package is Act 482 (SB287), effective 1 August 2026, which imposes enforcement-adjacent obligations on virtual-currency-kiosk owners and operators specifically. Where a kiosk operator was not properly licensed at the time of a transaction, the statute requires the operator to permit the user to cancel the transaction and receive a full refund at the operator's own expense, with a requirement to acknowledge the refund request within 10 business days and complete the refund within 90 calendar days. The statute additionally requires kiosk operators to provide toll-free live customer support. These are concrete, dated compliance obligations layered onto the existing VCBA licensing architecture rather than changes to the licensing-trigger definition itself.

Outlook

With the sunset clause removed, Louisiana's VCBA licensing regime should be read going forward as a durable feature of the state's regulatory architecture rather than a pilot with a built-in expiry, subject to the new federal-preemption trigger should Congress later enact a licensure law of its own. The precise statutory section governing the VCBA's minimum net-worth and surety-bond requirements was not independently confirmed against primary text this cycle, and remains an open item for future verification.

1 earlier distinct update(s)
Periodic update · new data 2026-10-11

Crypto Licensing

Louisianas Virtual Currency Businesses Act (VCBA) has required a licence for virtual-currency business activity with Louisiana residents since 1 July 2023, with the Office of Financial Institutions (OFI) having begun NMLS-based licence intake from 1 January 2023. That licensing requirement itself is unchanged this cycle. What has changed, materially, is the durability of the regime underpinning it: Act 923 (SB 163), effective 1 August 2026, repeals the 1 July 2027 sunset date that had been written into the VCBA, replacing it with a provision under which the licensing framework becomes void only to the extent a future federal virtual-currency licensure law preempts it. This is a confirmed, Tier-1-sourced development, drawn directly from OFIs own legislative-summary memorandum dated 24 July 2026.

The practical consequence is that Louisianas VCBA licensing regime is no longer a time-limited experiment awaiting a 2027 expiry decision by the legislature. It is now a standing framework that persists indefinitely unless and until federal virtual-currency licensure legislation is enacted and found to preempt it. For the approximately 36 VCBA licensees reportedly supervised by OFI, each subject to a $100,000 minimum tangible net worth requirement and scaled surety bonds according to committee testimony reported by a lower-tier source, this removes a multi-year planning uncertainty that would otherwise have attached to the approaching 2027 sunset date. That licensee-count and net-worth figure, however, rests on a single lower-tier aggregator account of committee testimony rather than a primary OFI licensee register, and should be treated accordingly pending independent confirmation.

A companion measure, SB 287, also effective 1 August 2026, adds quarterly cancellation/refund reporting obligations for virtual-currency-kiosk operators specifically, layering additional conduct-level duties onto the existing VCBA licensing base rather than creating a separate licensing track. The exact Act number assigned to SB 287 has not been cross-verified against the enrolled act text this cycle; one secondary source names it as Act No. 482 of 2026, but this remains unconfirmed.

No Louisiana statute classifies crypto-asset token types by category; the VCBA regulates conduct by virtual-currency businesses rather than classifying the tokens those businesses handle, leaving federal SEC and CFTC classification frameworks to apply by default. This is a structural feature of the states approach rather than a gap introduced this cycle.

Outlook

With the sunset repealed, the VCBA licensing framework is Louisianas durable baseline going forward, with its only identified exit path being the federal-preemption nullification clause. Confirmation of the exact SB 287 act number, and independent verification of the reported 36-licensee population and associated prudential figures against a primary OFI source, remain open items that would strengthen confidence in the secondary findings reported this cycle.

1 further periodic run re-emitted the standing brief unchanged and is not shown.

Sources and findings (4)
  1. T1 · Louisiana Office of Financial InstitutionsLouisiana Office of Financial Institutions — Louisiana OFI maintains a distinct 'Virtual Currency Business Activity' licensing category within its Non-Depository Services Division, separate from the general Money Transmitters category.retrieved M5bindingin force
  2. T1 · Louisiana Office of Financial InstitutionsLouisiana Office of Financial Institutions — OFI operates a 'Notification Filers' licensee track as a distinct, lighter-touch registration category alongside full Virtual Currency Business Activity licensure.retrieved M4bindingin force
  3. T3 · CoinDeskCoinDesk — Under the originating legislative design, individuals or entities dealing in less than $35,000 in virtual currency activity annually would only need to file a notification with OFI rather than obtain a full license.retrieved M3bindingin force
  4. T1 · Louisiana Office of Financial InstitutionsLouisiana Office of Financial Institutions — Louisiana's general money transmitter statute imposes bonding (minimum $25,000, scaling with transmission volume), annual renewal fees, and licensure conditions administered by OFI that can apply in parallel to virtual-currency businesses characterized as money transmitters.retrieved M3bindingin force

#

Louisiana has not enacted a state-level statutory taxonomy classifying tokens (e.g., security token vs. utility token vs. stablecoin). Token characterization in the state is governed by federal frameworks — principally SEC application of the Securities Act/Exchange Act 'investment contract' analysis and CFTC commodity characterization — which apply regardless of Louisiana's money-transmission/custody-focused state licensing regime. Louisiana's OFI licensing addresses money-transmission and custody activity, not securities status.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

no periodic updates on record for this sub-brief

Sources and findings (2)
  1. T1 · Louisiana Office of Financial InstitutionsLouisiana Office of Financial Institutions — Louisiana has no bespoke state statutory taxonomy for classifying virtual currency/tokens by type (security, utility, stablecoin, etc.); the OFI licensing regime addresses money-transmission and custody activity rather than token characterization.retrieved M3non-bindinga fact about the regime
  2. T1 · U.S. Securities and Exchange CommissionU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission — Federal SEC guidance treats certain digital securities (tokenized securities) as securities subject to federal securities laws regardless of state money-transmission licensing status, and this federal characterization governs uniformly across Louisiana.retrieved M4bindingin force

#

Louisiana has not been confirmed to maintain a dedicated statutory framework specifically addressing on-chain activities such as staking, DeFi, DEX operation, mining, node operation, validation, or tokenization as distinct regulatory categories. Federal SEC staff guidance (non-binding staff statement) indicates that self/solo and pool-based proof-of-work mining activities generally do not, under specified conditions, constitute the offer or sale of a security — a federal characterization relevant to any Louisiana-based mining operations, but this is staff-level guidance, not a Commission rule.

Standing sub-brief · as of 25 August 2026141 words · last cycle 2026-08-21

On-Chain Activity Regime

The Blockchain Basics Act requires foreign-owned digital-asset mining facilities operating in Louisiana to divest or cease operations within one year of the law's effect, or face fines of up to one million dollars. This foreign-ownership divestment mandate is a distinct restriction not typical of other state mining-rights statutes, which more commonly focus on domestic protections such as energy-rate treatment or zoning rather than ownership-based restrictions. The mandate coexists with the Act's protection of domestic self-custody and home mining from additional licensing burdens, producing a regime that is favorable to domestic on-chain activity while actively restrictive toward foreign-owned mining infrastructure.

No new data since the standing brief. 1 periodic run re-emitted it unchanged.

Sources and findings (2)
  1. T1 · U.S. Securities and Exchange CommissionU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission — SEC Division of Corporation Finance staff has stated that certain protocol (self/solo) mining and mining-pool activities, under specified conditions, do not involve the offer and sale of securities under the Securities Act or Exchange Act — a federal characterization applicable to mining conducted in Louisiana.retrieved M3non-binding
  2. T1 · Louisiana Office of Financial InstitutionsLouisiana Office of Financial Institutions — No Louisiana-specific statute or OFI rule dedicated to custodial or non-custodial staking activity was identified; such activity would likely be assessed under the existing virtual-currency/money-transmission licensing trigger rather than a purpose-built staking regime.retrieved M2non-bindingour coverage gap, expected to resolve on a re-run

#

Louisiana has no identified state-level stablecoin-specific statute governing issuance authorization, reserve requirements, redemption rights, disclosure, or systemic designation for stablecoins. Stablecoin issuance in the U.S. is primarily governed at the federal level (e.g., the GENIUS Act framework for payment stablecoins), which Louisiana has not supplemented with its own bespoke regime as far as this research pass could confirm.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

no periodic updates on record for this sub-brief

Sources and findings (1)
  1. No Louisiana state-specific stablecoin issuance authorization regime was identified in this research pass; stablecoin issuance in Louisiana is governed by federal frameworks rather than a bespoke state stablecoin statute.M2non-bindinga fact about the regime

#

The 2026 dual-currency sweepstakes-casino ban (Act 182/HB883) and racketeering predicate-offense expansion (Act 48/HB53) are highly relevant at the crypto/gambling nexus, with the AG's 2025 opinion codified into statute effective 2026-08-01.

Standing sub-brief · as of 22 September 2026344 words · last cycle 2026-10-18

Consumer Protection

Louisiana's consumer-protection posture toward virtual-currency-based gambling products tightened materially this cycle. Act 182 (HB883), effective August 1, 2026, rewrites the state's long-standing gambling-by-computer offense, codified at La. R.S. 14:90.3, to explicitly cover dual-currency systems: a product structure in which a consumer purchases a virtual currency that is then exchangeable for a second, cash-redeemable currency. This provision directly targets the sweepstakes-casino business model, which typically layers a non-redeemable promotional currency alongside a second, redeemable sweeps currency to argue around traditional gambling definitions. Act 182 closes that structural argument by name, and it raises the maximum fine under the statute from $20,000 to $100,000, a fivefold increase that signals the state's intent to make the economics of continued operation untenable for non-compliant platforms.

Periodic update · new data 2026-10-18

Consumer Protection

Act 482 (SB287), effective 1 August 2026, strengthens consumer protections specific to virtual-currency kiosks operating in Louisiana. Where a kiosk owner or operator was not properly licensed at the time a transaction occurred, the user must be permitted to cancel the transaction and receive a full refund at the operator's expense; the operator must acknowledge the refund request within 10 business days and complete the refund within 90 calendar days, and must provide toll-free live customer support to users. The same Act requires kiosk owners and operators to clearly disclose to residents their right to contact the Office of Financial Institutions with complaints, and to include a licensee contact point together with the kiosk's unique identifier on every transaction receipt.

These duties build on the enhanced-due-diligence policy obligation already imposed on virtual-currency-kiosk operators by Act 369 (HB483), effective in 2025, under which each operator must implement, maintain and enforce a written enhanced due diligence policy. Taken together, the refund, complaint-handling, disclosure and due-diligence obligations now applicable to kiosk operators represent a materially more concrete consumer-protection framework for this specific channel than exists for virtual-currency business activity generally in Louisiana, where broader custody and market-abuse rules distinct from general Louisiana Securities Law have not been located.

Outlook

The kiosk-specific consumer-protection regime is now reasonably well specified on refund timing, disclosure content and due-diligence process; whether OFI issues further guidance on the mechanics of complaint handling, or whether equivalent protections are extended beyond the kiosk channel to virtual-currency business activity generally, remains open.

1 earlier distinct update(s)
Periodic update · new data 2026-10-11

Consumer Protection

SB 287 of the 2026 Regular Session, codified amendments to R.S. 6:1389 and 6:1393.1, introduces new consumer-protection duties specific to virtual-currency-kiosk operators in Louisiana, effective 1 August 2026. Kiosk operators must allow users to cancel certain transactions for a full refund under specified conditions, and must disclose the transaction fee amount and a unique operator identifier on the printed receipt. This is a Tier-1-sourced, confirmed development drawn directly from the enrolled legislative text.

The scope of this protection is narrow and conduct-specific: it applies to the kiosk channel within the broader VCBA-licensed virtual-currency business population, rather than establishing a general custody-segregation or market-abuse framework applicable to all virtual-currency businesses operating in the state. No Louisiana statute establishes a broader custody-segregation requirement or market-abuse prohibition for virtual-currency businesses generally; the kiosk-specific cancellation, refund, and disclosure duties introduced by SB 287 are the full extent of the states consumer-protection architecture for virtual-currency activity identified this cycle.

Whether the Office of Financial Institutions has promulgated implementing rules under the relevant administrative code provisions to operationalise the SB 287 kiosk-reporting and disclosure amendments has not been confirmed this cycle; this is recorded as an open item for subsequent verification rather than an assumption either way.

Outlook

The kiosk cancellation, refund, and disclosure duties take effect 1 August 2026. Confirmation of whether OFI has issued implementing rules to operationalise these requirements, and whether the states consumer-protection architecture for virtual-currency activity is extended beyond the kiosk channel in a future legislative cycle, remain the principal open questions for this module going forward.

1 further periodic run re-emitted the standing brief unchanged and is not shown.

Sources and findings (2)
  1. T3 · CoinDeskCoinDesk — Under the originating Louisiana virtual-currency licensing bill, applicants and their executives are subject to investigation of their 'experience, character and general fitness' as a licensing precondition administered by OFI.retrieved M3bindingin force
  2. No dedicated Louisiana statutory custody-segregation requirement specific to virtual-currency custodians, distinct from general licensing fitness/bonding preconditions, was confirmed in this research pass.M3non-bindingour coverage gap, expected to resolve on a re-run

#

No Louisiana-specific statutory carve-out or guidance addressing the state income tax, sales/use tax, or withholding treatment of virtual currency transactions was identified in this research pass. In the absence of state-specific guidance, federal tax characterization (crypto assets as property, per longstanding IRS guidance) would presumptively flow through to Louisiana's income tax base given the state's general conformity to federal adjusted gross income, but this state-specific conformity link was not independently confirmed here and should be treated as an open item.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

no periodic updates on record for this sub-brief

Sources and findings (2)
  1. No Louisiana-specific statute or Department of Revenue guidance on the state tax treatment of virtual currency capital gains was identified in this research pass.M3non-bindingour coverage gap, expected to resolve on a re-run
  2. No Louisiana-specific virtual-currency tax reporting obligation distinct from federal Form 1099-DA broker reporting requirements was identified in this research pass.M2non-bindingour coverage gap, expected to resolve on a re-run

#

Louisiana has no identified state-level cross-border virtual-currency transfer restriction distinct from federal sanctions and Bank Secrecy Act frameworks. Federal OFAC sanctions screening and FinCEN money-transmitter/MSB characterization govern cross-border virtual currency movement uniformly, with Louisiana's OFI licensing regime addressing in-state money-transmission activity rather than cross-border-specific rules.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

no periodic updates on record for this sub-brief

Sources and findings (2)
  1. T1 · Financial Crimes Enforcement NetworkFinancial Crimes Enforcement Network — No Louisiana-specific outbound restriction on virtual-currency cross-border transfers, distinct from federal OFAC sanctions and FinCEN money-transmitter rules, was identified in this research pass.retrieved M2non-bindinga fact about the regime
  2. T1 · Financial Crimes Enforcement NetworkFinancial Crimes Enforcement Network — Federal OFAC sanctions screening obligations apply uniformly to virtual-currency businesses operating in Louisiana as they do nationally, independent of the state's OFI licensing regime.retrieved M4bindingin force

#

No standing position recorded for this category.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

no periodic updates on record for this sub-brief

Sources and findings (1)
  1. T4Louisiana crypto commercial activity — No named Louisiana crypto-sector commercial transaction identified within the mandated 1-year lookback.retrieved M1non-binding
No categories match.

Filters combine as OR inside a group and AND across groups.

Publication gate

No failing checks.

schema_validpass
min_quoted_text_presentwaived — floor 0%
egress_verifiedpass
every_practical_object_has_source_idn/a — no subject in this jurisdiction
source_tier_integrity_okpass
jurisdiction_source_floor_metpass
tier_a_b_national_primary_pct85.71
aggregator_only_jurisdiction_count0
manual_override

Editorial metadata

Provenance only. Nothing below gates publication or affects the render.

Editorial metadata for Louisiana, USA
FieldValue
trust.lawyer_review.statusnever_reviewed
trust.lawyer_review.reviewerno reviewer on record
trust.content_sourceai_generated

Provenance and declared absence

Disclosure model: module cards load OPEN; standing positions render in full; sub-briefs and jurisdiction briefs load as a clamped teaser with an explicit “read full” control carrying the true word count; earlier updates stay collapsed behind a counted summary. No text is hidden without disclosing how much of it there is.

Sentinel-fed modules receive no special rendering treatment. sentinel_feed is an attribution chip only: it does not suppress content, does not generate an absence reason code, and does not exclude the module from any count, filter, search index or export on this page.

Family taxonomy is renderer-level presentation config, not a JID field. Colour is always duplicated in text and is never the sole carrier of meaning.

Suppressed by doctrine: derived risk score; per-module RAG traffic light; derived_scores = {}.

Band honesty: uncertainty bands are computed against a frozen build clock of 2026-10-20. A year-precision row is never promoted into a tighter band.

Orphan deltas: 0 cycle_delta row(s) target non-module objects and are listed in the rail rather than attached to a card.

Envelope: baseline resolved at jurisdiction_json.baseline; 8 module(s), 16 finding(s), 18 source(s) in the cumulative register.

Think something on this page is wrong? Report an error.