Cryptoassets Regulatory Intelligence cryptoassets.gi
US-MT · run crypto-2026-08-06 v13.3.0
content: ai_generated 11 sources retrieved model claude-sonnet-5 ·

United States – Montana

US-MT schema crypto-v2.0.0 trajectory: not recordedunregulated gap

Last updated · 8 categories · 16 sourced findings · 11 sources in the cumulative register

8Categoriesbaseline.
16Findings.claims[]
0Tier-1 sourcesrun_metadata.t1_source_count
Confidence mix (sums to 8 rendered categories; click to filter)
No categories moved this cycle.

Jurisdiction brief

No content recorded at this JID path.

8 of 8 categories
Signal
Density

Selections OR within a group, AND across groups. Press / to search.

#

Montana is the only U.S. state with no money-transmitter licensing statute of any kind, and the Division of Banking and Financial Institutions has publicly confirmed it does not regulate money transmitters, including crypto exchange and custody businesses. This is a structural absence rather than a crypto-specific carve-out; federal FinCEN MSB registration and other Montana licenses (e.g., consumer finance, escrow) may still apply depending on the activity mix.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (4)
  1. T?source not recordedM5bindingin force
  2. T?source not recordedM4bindingin force
  3. T?source not recordedM4bindingin force
  4. T?source not recordedM3non-binding

#

Montana HB 584 (2019) created a state-law exemption from the Montana Securities Act for 'utility tokens' whose purpose is primarily consumptive, subject to conditions including a notice-of-intent filing with the state securities commissioner. This exemption operates only at the state securities-law layer; federal SEC/CFTC characterization of a given token as a security or commodity governs regardless of Montana's utility-token carve-out.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (4)
  1. T?source not recordedM4bindingin force
  2. T?source not recordedM3bindingin force
  3. T?source not recordedM4bindingin force
  4. T?source not recordedM2non-binding

#

Montana SB 178 (2023), a 'right to mine' law, protects cryptocurrency mining activity from certain local restrictions, including zoning ordinances that had targeted mining operations at the county level. This is Montana's principal state-level on-chain-activity statute; no separate Montana statute addresses staking, DeFi lending, DEX operation, node operation, or validator activity specifically.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (2)
  1. T?source not recordedM4bindingin force
  2. T?source not recordedM2non-binding

#

Montana has no state-specific stablecoin issuance, reserve, redemption, disclosure, or systemic-designation regime. Payment stablecoin issuance is governed at the federal level (e.g., the GENIUS Act framework), and no Montana statute or regulator guidance creates a bespoke state-level stablecoin regime distinct from the general absence of money-transmitter licensing.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

#

Montana consumer protection touchpoints for crypto are limited to two state-law strands: (1) the HB 584 utility-token notice-of-intent filing, which functions as a disclosure mechanism, and (2) SB 118 (2017), Montana's Revised Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act, which addresses fiduciary management of digital property including digital currency (custody/estate context). No dedicated crypto marketing-restriction, suitability, or complaint-handling regime exists at the state level.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (2)
  1. T?source not recordedM3bindingin force
  2. T?source not recordedM3bindingin force

#

Montana has no crypto-specific tax statute. Crypto tax treatment follows the federal IRS position that convertible virtual currency is property (not currency), which flows through to Montana's state individual income tax base. Montana applies a distinct, generally lower bracket structure to net long-term capital gains, which would apply to long-term crypto asset dispositions on the same basis as other capital property.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (3)
  1. T?source not recordedM3bindingin force
  2. T?source not recordedM3bindingin force
  3. T?source not recordedM3bindingin force

#

Montana has no state-level cross-border crypto transfer restriction, sanctions-nexus rule, reporting threshold, or travel-rule regime distinct from the federal framework. Cross-border crypto transfers by Montana-based businesses are governed exclusively by federal OFAC sanctions screening and FinCEN travel-rule requirements, which apply uniformly regardless of Montana's absence of state money-transmitter licensing.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

#

AML/CFT obligations applicable to Montana-based crypto businesses (KYC/CDD, travel rule, SAR/STR reporting, sanctions screening, record-keeping, risk assessment) are sourced federally via FinCEN/BSA and are covered under the crypto consumer's subscribed Financial Integrity Module (FIM) aml_ctf baseline rather than produced independently in this jurisdiction research pass, per fleet module-subscription doctrine.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (1)
  1. T?source not recordedM1non-binding
No categories match.

Filters combine as OR inside a group and AND across groups.

Editorial metadata

Provenance only. Nothing below gates publication or affects the render.

Editorial metadata for United States – Montana
FieldValue
trust.lawyer_review.statusnever_reviewed
trust.lawyer_review.reviewernot recorded
trust.content_sourceai_generated

Provenance and declared absence

Disclosure model: module cards load OPEN; standing positions render in full; sub-briefs and jurisdiction briefs load as a clamped teaser with an explicit “read full” control carrying the true word count; earlier updates stay collapsed behind a counted summary. No text is hidden without disclosing how much of it there is.

Sentinel-fed modules receive no special rendering treatment. sentinel_feed is an attribution chip only: it does not suppress content, does not generate an absence reason code, and does not exclude the module from any count, filter, search index or export on this page.

Family taxonomy is renderer-level presentation config, not a JID field. Colour is always duplicated in text and is never the sole carrier of meaning.

Suppressed by doctrine: derived risk score; per-module RAG traffic light; derived_scores = {}.

Band honesty: uncertainty bands are computed against a frozen build clock of 2026-08-17. A year-precision row is never promoted into a tighter band.

Orphan deltas: 0 cycle_delta row(s) target non-module objects and are listed in the rail rather than attached to a card.

Envelope: baseline resolved at jurisdiction_json.baseline; 8 module(s), 16 finding(s), 15 source(s) in the cumulative register.