Cryptoassets Regulatory Intelligence cryptoassets.gi
US-NM · run crypto-2026-08-06 v13.3.0
content: ai_generated 11 sources retrieved model claude-sonnet-5 ·

United States – New Mexico

US-NM schema crypto-v2.0.0 trajectory: not recordedregulatedoverlaps: FIM, WPM

Last updated · 8 categories · 25 sourced findings · 11 sources in the cumulative register

8Categoriesbaseline.
25Findings.claims[]
0Tier-1 sourcesrun_metadata.t1_source_count
Confidence mix (sums to 8 rendered categories; click to filter)
No categories moved this cycle.

Jurisdiction brief

No content recorded at this JID path.

8 of 8 categories
Signal
Density

Selections OR within a group, AND across groups. Press / to search.

#

New Mexico has no bespoke crypto-asset licensing statute. Virtual-currency exchange and custody businesses operating in New Mexico fall under the state's general money-transmitter licensing regime, administered through the multistate NMLS system, with the exact codified citation and any crypto-specific carve-outs not independently verified in this pass.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (3)
  1. T?source not recordedM5bindingin force
  2. T?source not recordedM3bindingin force
  3. T?source not recordedM3non-binding

#

New Mexico has no state-level token classification framework. Characterisation of crypto assets (as securities, commodities, or otherwise) is governed by federal law, principally the SEC/CFTC interpretive release on the application of federal securities laws to crypto assets, which establishes a taxonomy of digital commodities, digital collectibles, digital tools, payment stablecoins, and digital securities.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (3)
  1. T?source not recordedM3non-binding
  2. T?source not recordedM5bindingin force
  3. T?source not recordedM5bindingenacted not yet effective

#

New Mexico has no state-specific regulatory regime addressing on-chain activities such as staking, DeFi lending, mining, node operation, or validation. The only applicable interpretive framework is the 2026 federal SEC/CFTC release addressing protocol mining and protocol staking under the Howey test.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (2)
  1. T?source not recordedM4bindingin force
  2. T?source not recordedM3non-binding

#

New Mexico has no bespoke state stablecoin regime. Stablecoin issuance is governed by the federal GENIUS Act (signed July 18, 2025), which establishes permitted-issuer categories, 1:1 reserve backing, redemption rights, and disclosure obligations. Implementing regulations from OCC, FDIC, NCUA, the Federal Reserve, and Treasury remain proposed as of this research pass, with a statutory effective date no later than January 18, 2027.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (5)
  1. T?source not recordedM5bindingenacted not yet effective
  2. T?source not recordedM5bindingenacted not yet effective
  3. T?source not recordedM4bindingenacted not yet effective
  4. T?source not recordedM4bindingenacted not yet effective
  5. T?source not recordedM2non-binding

#

No New Mexico-specific crypto consumer-protection statute, rule, or regulator guidance (e.g., marketing restrictions, mandated risk disclosures, or crypto-specific custody segregation rules) has been identified. Baseline protections, to the extent any apply, would derive from generic money-transmitter bonding/customer-funds provisions rather than crypto-tailored rules.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (2)
  1. T?source not recordedM3non-binding
  2. T?source not recordedM3non-binding

#

Federal tax treatment of crypto assets as property, with capital-gains and ordinary-income consequences depending on the transaction type, applies to New Mexico taxpayers. No New Mexico-specific crypto tax statute or Taxation and Revenue Department guidance diverging from federal treatment has been independently verified in this research pass.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (5)
  1. T?source not recordedM5bindingin force
  2. T?source not recordedM4bindingin force
  3. T?source not recordedM2non-binding
  4. T?source not recordedM3bindingin force
  5. T?source not recordedM2non-binding

#

New Mexico has no state-specific outbound restriction on crypto asset transfers. Federal Bank Secrecy Act obligations, including OFAC sanctions screening and the FinCEN funds/CVC travel rule, apply to New Mexico-licensed money transmitters engaged in convertible virtual currency transmission.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (4)
  1. T?source not recordedM4bindingin force
  2. T?source not recordedM4bindingin force
  3. T?source not recordedM2non-binding
  4. T?source not recordedM2non-binding

#

This consumer subscribes to the FIM aml_ctf module for AML/CFT baseline content; no AML/CFT-specific claims are produced in this crypto-consumer baseline for New Mexico. New Mexico-licensed money transmitters (including virtual-currency businesses) are independently subject to Bank Secrecy Act obligations as FinCEN-registered money services businesses, which is captured under the FIM subscription rather than duplicated here.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (1)
  1. T?source not recordedM1non-binding
No categories match.

Filters combine as OR inside a group and AND across groups.

Editorial metadata

Provenance only. Nothing below gates publication or affects the render.

Editorial metadata for United States – New Mexico
FieldValue
trust.lawyer_review.statusnever_reviewed
trust.lawyer_review.reviewernot recorded
trust.content_sourceai_generated

Provenance and declared absence

Disclosure model: module cards load OPEN; standing positions render in full; sub-briefs and jurisdiction briefs load as a clamped teaser with an explicit “read full” control carrying the true word count; earlier updates stay collapsed behind a counted summary. No text is hidden without disclosing how much of it there is.

Sentinel-fed modules receive no special rendering treatment. sentinel_feed is an attribution chip only: it does not suppress content, does not generate an absence reason code, and does not exclude the module from any count, filter, search index or export on this page.

Family taxonomy is renderer-level presentation config, not a JID field. Colour is always duplicated in text and is never the sole carrier of meaning.

Suppressed by doctrine: derived risk score; per-module RAG traffic light; derived_scores = {}.

Band honesty: uncertainty bands are computed against a frozen build clock of 2026-08-17. A year-precision row is never promoted into a tighter band.

Orphan deltas: 0 cycle_delta row(s) target non-module objects and are listed in the rail rather than attached to a card.

Envelope: baseline resolved at jurisdiction_json.baseline; 8 module(s), 25 finding(s), 11 source(s) in the cumulative register.