Cryptoassets Regulatory Intelligence cryptoassets.gi
US-WV · run crypto-2026-08-06 v13.3.0
content: ai_generated 13 sources retrieved model claude-sonnet-5 ·

United States – West Virginia

US-WV schema crypto-v2.0.0 trajectory: not recordedregulatedoverlaps: FIM, WPM

Last updated · 8 categories · 13 sourced findings · 13 sources in the cumulative register

8Categoriesbaseline.
13Findings.claims[]
0Tier-1 sourcesrun_metadata.t1_source_count
Confidence mix (sums to 8 rendered categories; click to filter)
No categories moved this cycle.

Jurisdiction brief

No content recorded at this JID path.

8 of 8 categories
Signal
Density

Selections OR within a group, AND across groups. Press / to search.

#

West Virginia has no bespoke crypto-asset licensing statute. Crypto exchanges and custody businesses are regulated under the state's general money-transmitter licensing law, administered by the state's banking/financial-institutions authority and processed through the Nationwide Multistate Licensing System (NMLS). Verification of the specific statutory citation and any crypto-specific carve-outs remains open (seed caution flag honoured).

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (2)
  1. T?source not recordedM5bindingin force
  2. T?source not recordedM3non-binding

#

West Virginia has no state-level crypto token taxonomy. Token characterisation for securities purposes is governed by federal SEC/CFTC jurisdiction, applied uniformly regardless of state MTL licensing status, per the seed disambiguation.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (2)
  1. T?source not recordedM4bindingin force
  2. T?source not recordedM3non-binding

#

No West Virginia-specific statute addressing mining, staking, validator operation, DeFi, or tokenization activity has been identified in this pass. Several other states (e.g. Kentucky, South Carolina) have enacted mining/self-custody protection statutes; West Virginia has not been confirmed to have an equivalent as of the dispatch date.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (1)
  1. T?source not recordedM3non-binding

#

West Virginia has no state-specific stablecoin statute. The federal GENIUS Act (enacted 2025) establishes the applicable payment-stablecoin framework nationwide, including West Virginia, covering issuance authorisation, reserve backing, and consumer-protection provisions.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (2)
  1. T?source not recordedM4bindingenacted not yet effective
  2. T?source not recordedM4bindingenacted not yet effective

#

No West Virginia-specific crypto consumer-protection statute has been identified. Crypto exchanges licensed as money transmitters are subject to the general customer-fund safeguarding obligations applicable to all state-licensed money transmitters, though a crypto-specific custody or disclosure rule has not been separately verified.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (1)
  1. T?source not recordedM3bindingin force

#

No West Virginia-specific crypto tax statute has been identified. Federal tax treatment (IRS: crypto as property, subject to capital-gains recognition on disposition, and new broker Form 1099-DA reporting) governs; West Virginia personal income tax generally is understood to reference federal adjusted gross income, but the state's specific conformity mechanism for digital-asset property treatment was not independently verified in this pass.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (3)
  1. T?source not recordedM4bindingin force
  2. T?source not recordedM4bindingin force
  3. T?source not recordedM3non-binding

#

No West Virginia-specific cross-border crypto transfer restriction has been identified. Federal Bank Secrecy Act obligations (FinCEN Funds Travel Rule, sanctions screening) apply to state-licensed money transmitters engaging in cross-border convertible-virtual-currency transmittals.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

Sources and findings (2)
  1. T?source not recordedM3bindingin force
  2. T?source not recordedM2non-binding

#

AML/CFT obligations for money-transmitter-licensed crypto businesses in West Virginia flow from the federal Bank Secrecy Act (FinCEN money-services-business registration, CVC guidance, and Funds Travel Rule), which are covered under this consumer's Financial Integrity Module (FIM) subscription rather than duplicated here. Disambiguation context only: West Virginia's own criminal money-laundering statute (House Bill 2585, enacted circa 2019) separately amended the state's money-laundering law to define 'cryptocurrency' as a type of 'monetary instrument' for state anti-money-laundering/criminal-enforcement purposes; this is a state criminal-law fact noted for context and is not restated as an aml_cft_regime claim per the FIM subscription rule.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

No periodic updates recorded against this sub-brief.

No categories match.

Filters combine as OR inside a group and AND across groups.

Editorial metadata

Provenance only. Nothing below gates publication or affects the render.

Editorial metadata for United States – West Virginia
FieldValue
trust.lawyer_review.statusnever_reviewed
trust.lawyer_review.reviewernot recorded
trust.content_sourceai_generated

Provenance and declared absence

Disclosure model: module cards load OPEN; standing positions render in full; sub-briefs and jurisdiction briefs load as a clamped teaser with an explicit “read full” control carrying the true word count; earlier updates stay collapsed behind a counted summary. No text is hidden without disclosing how much of it there is.

Sentinel-fed modules receive no special rendering treatment. sentinel_feed is an attribution chip only: it does not suppress content, does not generate an absence reason code, and does not exclude the module from any count, filter, search index or export on this page.

Family taxonomy is renderer-level presentation config, not a JID field. Colour is always duplicated in text and is never the sole carrier of meaning.

Suppressed by doctrine: derived risk score; per-module RAG traffic light; derived_scores = {}.

Band honesty: uncertainty bands are computed against a frozen build clock of 2026-08-17. A year-precision row is never promoted into a tighter band.

Orphan deltas: 0 cycle_delta row(s) target non-module objects and are listed in the rail rather than attached to a card.

Envelope: baseline resolved at jurisdiction_json.baseline; 8 module(s), 13 finding(s), 13 source(s) in the cumulative register.