Cryptoassets Regulatory Intelligence

KM-A Crypto & Digital Asset Regulation

KM-A schema crypto-v2.0.0 trajectory: not yet assessed unregulated gap overlaps: Sentinel (AML/CFT)

Last updated · 7 categories · 15 sourced findings · 10 sources in the cumulative register

Evidence re-verified: ·Position last changed: ·
Record history & provenance ▾

Methodology & record provenance: Module confidence is derived from the underlying claims (source tier and primary excerpt retention), while statutory legal force is tracked independently.

Review status: AI-synthesised · Tier-1/2 verified · As-of date: 2026-10-26

Framework postureUnregulated gap7 of 9 modules populated · AI-synthesised · Tier-1/2 verified
Lead supervisory authorityFATF / ESAAMLGPrimary statutory & supervisory perimeter
Next milestone (> 2026-10-26)None scheduledNo dated future statutory milestone on record
Module coverage & confidence7 / 9 modules assessed0 Confirmed · 7 Probable · 0 Uncertain · 2 Not yet assessed

Jurisdiction lead brief

Standing brief, as of 4 November 2026.

Lead Signal

No crypto licensing regime recognised by the Comoros government exists on Anjouan. Commentary aimed at prospective licensees warns plainly that a crypto licence obtained through the island's self-styled financial-authority brands is not officially recognised by the national government, making it a risky legal foundation for a crypto entity. This is not a gap awaiting legislative action; it is a structural absence rooted in the constitutional allocation of power. Article 9 of the Union Constitution, together with Organic Law No. 05-003/AU, places banking and financial legislative competence exclusively with the Union government, leaving the island-level bodies marketing these licences with no legal basis to create or confer one. Entities building on an Anjouan crypto credential are building on an instrument the Comoros state does not recognise as its own.

Key regulatory facts for KM-A
Regulatory DimensionKM-A Standing Position
JurisdictionKM-A (KM-A)
Regulatory ScopeCrypto & Digital Asset Regulation (7 modules, 15 sourced findings)
Crypto LicensingNo crypto-asset licensing regime recognised by the Union of the Comoros applies to KM-A specifically.
Token ClassificationThe Union of the Comoros has no statutory taxonomy distinguishing security tokens, e-money tokens, asset-referenced tokens, utility tokens, stablecoins or NFTs.
On-Chain Activity RegimeNo regulation of staking, DeFi lending, DEX operation, mining, node/validator operation, or tokenization activity has been identified in Comoros law.
Stablecoin RegimeNo stablecoin or e-money-token specific issuance, reserve, redemption, or systemic-designation framework exists in Comoros law.
Primary Instruments CitedFATF / ESAAMLG, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (EDGAR filer disclosure), Anjouan crypto licence (AOFA/AFSA/AFSC), Union Constitution Art. 9 / Organic Law No. 05-003/AU
Last Confirmed / Updated2026-11-04 (10 sources in cumulative register)

#

No crypto-asset licensing regime recognised by the Union of the Comoros applies to KM-A specifically. Multiple competing self-styled Anjouan financial authorities market crypto-related licences, none recognised by the Central Bank of the Comoros.

Open gap — crypto-int-1Which of the three competing self-styled Anjouan financial-authority names (AOFA/AFSA/AFSC) is currently used by the active crypto-licence vendor remains unresolved; one T1 source (Dec 2025 BCC communique) was only recalled, not independently retrieved, this pass.no under-indexing note recorded
No sub-brief written this cycleThe module carries open gaps but no narrative analysis was authored this cycle. Flagged for the next research pass.

No periodic updates recorded in this cycle

Sources and findings (6)
  1. T2FATF / ESAAMLG — No virtual-asset-service-provider (VASP) licensing or registration regime exists in the Union of the Comoros (including Anjouan); the national AML/CFT mutual evaluation records that no VASPs have been reported to exist or to operate in the country. retrieved M5 non-binding
  2. T2FATF / ESAAMLG — General commercial entities, including those formed on Anjouan, must be registered at the Commercial Courts of Moroni, Moheli or Anjouan (or with the national business registry APNI) under OHADA-derived company law; this is a general corporate registration duty, not a crypto-specific licence. retrieved M3 binding in force
  3. T4U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (EDGAR filer disclosure) — Market and corporate-disclosure sources (e.g., an SEC filing listing acceptable offshore gambling licence origins) refer to 'an offshore license from a nation such as Anjouan,' indicating informal commercial recognition of Anjouan-issued offshore licences in some sectors; no primary Comoros state regulator confirming a dedicated crypto-asset licensing authority on Anjouan has been located, and the official FATF mutual evaluation states the Union of the Comoros is not an international financial centre nor an area for company incorporation/registration in the IFC sense. retrieved M4 non-binding
  4. T3Anjouan crypto licence (AOFA/AFSA/AFSC) — the Comoros government retrieved M4 non-binding
  5. T2Union Constitution Art. 9 / Organic Law No. 05-003/AU — the Union government, over banking and financial legislation retrieved M5 binding in force

#

The Union of the Comoros has no statutory taxonomy distinguishing security tokens, e-money tokens, asset-referenced tokens, utility tokens, stablecoins or NFTs. The FATF mutual evaluation attributes this to the fact that virtual-asset activity has not been reported in the country, so no classification framework has been triggered or developed.

C2 · Token Classification — Full Module Record0 sub-modules · 180 words · 1 traced claims · Re-verified 2026-11-04

The decision headline, regulatory posture (Red), primary framework, and supervisory authority above are open on the Free Explore layer. Register free with a business email for 3 full-record passes a month, or unlock all 170 jurisdictions with Pro (£39/mo · £99/mo all products) or Firm (£199/mo · £449/mo all products).

#

No regulation of staking, DeFi lending, DEX operation, mining, node/validator operation, or tokenization activity has been identified in Comoros law. The absence of any reported VASP activity in the FATF mutual evaluation implies these on-chain activities are likewise unregulated and unsupervised.

C3 · On-Chain Activity — Full Module Record0 sub-modules · 180 words · 1 traced claims · Re-verified 2026-11-04

The decision headline, regulatory posture (Red), primary framework, and supervisory authority above are open on the Free Explore layer. Register free with a business email for 3 full-record passes a month, or unlock all 170 jurisdictions with Pro (£39/mo · £99/mo all products) or Firm (£199/mo · £449/mo all products).

#

No stablecoin or e-money-token specific issuance, reserve, redemption, or systemic-designation framework exists in Comoros law. No evidence of any stablecoin issuer operating under Comoros/Anjouan authorisation was found.

C4 · Stablecoins & EMTs — Full Module Record0 sub-modules · 180 words · 1 traced claims · Re-verified 2026-11-04

The decision headline, regulatory posture (Red), primary framework, and supervisory authority above are open on the Free Explore layer. Register free with a business email for 3 full-record passes a month, or unlock all 170 jurisdictions with Pro (£39/mo · £99/mo all products) or Firm (£199/mo · £449/mo all products).

#

No crypto-specific consumer-protection rules — custody/segregation of client crypto-assets, market-abuse prohibitions, order-handling/conflicts rules, marketing restrictions, complaint-handling procedures, or suitability/appropriateness duties — have been identified for Comoros or Anjouan. General consumer-protection or financial-conduct law, where it exists, has not been shown to extend to crypto-asset services. The global FATF work on offshore VASPs (oVASPs) explicitly cautions that jurisdictions permitting the creation of VASPs without effective home supervision raise elevated risk for clients of firms using such licences.

Absence reason not determinableNo sub-brief exists and the JID records no gap or review marker explaining why. The renderer will not invent a reason.

No periodic updates recorded in this cycle

Sources and findings (4)

    #

    No crypto-specific tax guidance (capital gains, income tax, VAT/GST, withholding, or reporting obligations) has been located for the Union of the Comoros or Anjouan. This research pass did not establish whether general Comoros corporate/income tax law is applied by the tax administration to crypto-asset transactions by default.

    C6 · Tax Treatment — Full Module Record0 sub-modules · 180 words · 1 traced claims · Re-verified 2026-11-04

    The decision headline, regulatory posture (Amber), primary framework, and supervisory authority above are open on the Free Explore layer. Register free with a business email for 3 full-record passes a month, or unlock all 170 jurisdictions with Pro (£39/mo · £99/mo all products) or Firm (£199/mo · £449/mo all products).

    #

    No crypto-specific cross-border transfer rule (outbound restriction, sanctions nexus, reporting threshold, or cross-border travel rule) has been identified for Comoros/Anjouan. General exchange-control or financial-reporting rules administered by BCC and the FIU were not confirmed to extend to crypto-asset transfers.

    C7 · Cross-Border & Travel Rule — Full Module Record0 sub-modules · 180 words · 1 traced claims · Re-verified 2026-11-04

    The decision headline, regulatory posture (Red), primary framework, and supervisory authority above are open on the Free Explore layer. Register free with a business email for 3 full-record passes a month, or unlock all 170 jurisdictions with Pro (£39/mo · £99/mo all products) or Firm (£199/mo · £449/mo all products).

    No categories match.

    Filters combine as OR inside a group and AND across groups.

    Provenance and declared absence

    Disclosure model: module cards load OPEN; standing positions render in full; sub-briefs and jurisdiction briefs load as a clamped teaser with an explicit “read full” control carrying the true word count; earlier updates stay collapsed behind a counted summary. No text is hidden without disclosing how much of it there is.

    Sentinel-fed modules receive no special rendering treatment. sentinel_feed is an attribution chip only: it does not suppress content, does not generate an absence reason code, and does not exclude the module from any count, filter, search index or export on this page.

    Family taxonomy is renderer-level presentation config, not a JID field. Colour is always duplicated in text and is never the sole carrier of meaning.

    Suppressed by doctrine: derived risk score; per-module RAG traffic light. Not shown on this page.

    Band honesty: uncertainty bands are computed against a frozen build clock of 2026-11-04. A year-precision row is never promoted into a tighter band.

    Orphan deltas: 0 cycle_delta row(s) target non-module objects and are listed in the rail rather than attached to a card.

    Envelope: baseline resolved at jurisdiction_json.baseline; 7 module(s), 15 finding(s), 10 source(s) in the cumulative register.

    Audit trail

    Machine checkChallenged on 24 Oct 2026: nothing tested (no claim on this page was eligible for an automated test). An automated, adversarial test run by a second model; no person has assessed the result.

    Think something on this page is wrong? Report an error.